• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER 635 SELF-EXPANDING BILIARY STENT; FGE CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC - BILIARY STENT - METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER 635 SELF-EXPANDING BILIARY STENT; FGE CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC - BILIARY STENT - METAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problems Insufficient Information (3190); Migration (4003)
Patient Problems Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
One patient had a device deficiency reported during the procedure.In the patient¿s medical record, the stent was noted as defective (no further description), and another stent was placed astride the first one to cover it.Additionally, this is of one of the two patients for whom technical success was not achieved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.510k: k163018.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k) # k163018.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
 
Event Description
Supplemental report is being submitted due to the receipt of additional information.Cc form received 26-aug-22: mdr (b)(4): device issue (biliary stent): first stent not at the exact place.((b)(4) the site entered the ae as follows, ¿second prosthesis astride the first one which was not at the exact place¿.Site assessed event as not related to the study stent, however, stated that the event was due to a device deficiency and only noted the following, ¿defective device¿.Patient outcome: the site marked ¿no treatment¿ on the crf; however, it appears that treatment would be considered placement of the second stent ¿astride the first¿ stent (per procedure form, 2nd stent was placed both side-by-side and through the wall of another stent ((b)(4)).The event was considered resolved (patient recovered/stabilized).This file will capture the first stent device deficiency (not at the exact place) and ther requirement for an additional stent.
 
Event Description
Supplemental report is being submitted due to the completion of the investigation on (b)(6) 2023.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k) # (b)(4).Device evaluation the device evaluation could not be completed as the device or photographic evidence of the device was not returned for evaluation.With the information provided, a document-based investigation was conducted.Lab evaluation ¿ n/a document review prior to distribution all zib6-40-10-4.0 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.Historical data was not reviewed as the lot number is unknown.It should be noted that the instructions for use (ifu0040) lists stent migration as a potential adverse event.There is no evidence to suggest the user did not follow the ifu.There is no evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the label.Image review an image was not returned for evaluation.Root cause review a definitive root cause could not be determined however a possible root cause could be attributed to known potential complications.The ifu lists stent migration as a potential adverse event.Summary the complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.According to the initial reporter, a second stent was required to be placed as a result of the original stent not being at the exact place.It is unclear from the information provided if the placement of the second stent occurred during the initial procedure or it this required a second procedure.Risk assessment is based on the requirement for a second procedure as a conservative assessment.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ZILVER 635 SELF-EXPANDING BILIARY STENT
Type of Device
FGE CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC - BILIARY STENT - METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK IRELAND
holstein campus kiel
arnold- keller str- 3
limerick
Manufacturer Contact
sinead o'leary
holstein campus kiel
arnold- keller str- 3
limerick 
MDR Report Key15310896
MDR Text Key298783248
Report Number3001845648-2022-00590
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/08/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/29/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received08/02/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age74 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight36 KG
-
-