Follow up report 001 ref natus complaint#(b)(4) a natus field service technician visited the customer to check the system.The system was checked for safety, and no issue was found.Capa trending review: this complaint does not identify a deficiency in the product design and therefore a capa is not required per (b)(4) emg-iom risk analysis file, hazard id - 10.2, severity 3 - marginal, the risk is considered low.A risk review is not required as this complaint does not describe a new failure mode or new harm and the existing hazard severity and/or probability of occurrence has not changed.Per qms-004442, complaint histories are reviewed routinely per quality system requirements and any complaint trends are assessed and documented as part of these reviews a device history record review is not applicable because, prior to the reported issue the device was in service for 2 or more years and a manufacturing defect is very unlikely.Install date: march 26, 2016."failure" confirmed: no.Investigation result code: neuro sbu|no issues noted.
|