• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INBONE TALAR DOME SZ 2 SULCUS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INBONE TALAR DOME SZ 2 SULCUS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Model Number 220220902
Device Problems Loss of Osseointegration (2408); Migration (4003)
Patient Problem Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
Event Date 08/05/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that patient will need to undergo a revision surgery due to some subsidence of the talus.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device is not available for evaluation as it remains in the patient.A review of the device history is not possible because the lot number was not communicated.Should additional information become available, it will be provided on a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
It was reported that patient will need to undergo a revision surgery due to some subsidence of the talus.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction b2, the reported event could not be confirmed, since the device was not returned for evaluation and no other evidences were provided.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.The device history record could not be reviewed because the affected device was not returned, and the lot number was not communicated.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Formal medical opinion was sought from an experienced independent medical expert as below.¿the ct scan of this case shows the tracks of an earlier trans-articular ankle nail which has been removed before the index surgery.At the time the tract was filled with bone cement, which also has been removed.The tibial inbone component has a sclerotic line and a thin radiolucent area surrounding it, the latter can be an image artifact, but is may also be indicative as an early sign of loosening.The tibial tray looks well-fixed, however.The pe-liner looks intact, yet a retrieval is necessary for definitive conclusions.The talar component has subsided, most likely due to the poorer quality of the talar bone after the earlier surgery.More clinical information is needed to assess the root cause (indication for revision), because amongst others, a low-grade infection could play a role in this case.¿ if device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: d1, h6 results code the reported event that was alleged of issue ¿implant - migration¿ could be confirmed, since information and images of the rep confirm the device was explanted.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.Formal medical opinion was sought from an experienced independent medical expert as below.¿the ct scan of this case shows the tracks of an earlier trans-articular ankle nail which has been removed before the index surgery.At the time the tract was filled with bone cement, which also has been removed.The tibial inbone component has a sclerotic line and a thin radiolucent area surrounding it, the latter can be an image artifact, but is may also be indicative as an early sign of loosening.The tibial tray looks well-fixed, however.The pe-liner looks intact, yet a retrieval is necessary for definitive conclusions.The talar component has subsided, most likely due to the poorer quality of the talar bone after the earlier surgery.More clinical information is needed to assess the root cause (indication for revision), because amongst others, a low-grade infection could play a role in this case.¿ if device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that patient will need to undergo a revision surgery due to some subsidence of the talus.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INBONE TALAR DOME SZ 2 SULCUS
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key15326829
MDR Text Key298956845
Report Number3010667733-2022-00292
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSN
UDI-Device Identifier00840420124210
UDI-Public00840420124210
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K100886
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/09/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/31/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number220220902
Device Catalogue Number220220902
Device Lot Number1625110
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/14/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/27/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age64 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-