• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V. INGENUITY CT; SYSTEM, X-RAY, TOMOGRAPHY, COMPUTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V. INGENUITY CT; SYSTEM, X-RAY, TOMOGRAPHY, COMPUTED Back to Search Results
Model Number INGENUITY CORE 64
Device Problem Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/04/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
This complaint has been evaluated based on the information provided; there is no allegation of death or serious injury.The issue reported was 5 of 5 fasteners securing the ct couch to the floor were dislodged and that there is potential for the couch to tip.The system was not in clinical use at the time.Based on information known at this time, this issue has been determined to be a reportable event.The issue is currently under investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Note: we have not completed our investigation of this event.We will file a follow-up emdr at the completion of the investigation.(b)(4).Date of report: (b)(6) 2022.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The issue reported was 5 of 5 fasteners securing the ct couch to the floor were dislodged and that there is potential for the couch to tip.The system was not in clinical use at the time.The customer¿s in-house engineer leaned on the couch and found it almost tip to the side (left and right) direction, therefore, reported the issue to philips.A philips field service engineer (fse) went to the site and evaluated the system.It was found that when the couch was intentionally pushed or pulled, it had side to side movement; however, the anchors were still in place so the couch could move slightly, but it would not tip over.The fse further concluded that all five anchors had lifted around 1/2 inch from the concrete floor and screw/washers were well tightened.Also visually there was some concrete around the hole broken in pieces.There was no direct cause found on site for the loose anchors.The fse re-secured 4 of 5 anchors back into place and return systemed to customer as the customer did not want any further downtime of the system to address the 5th anchor.Philips instructed the customer to halt use of the system until further investigation was performed.The fse re-visited the site and removed all 5 previous anchors.Then replaced with new anchors with a higher pull specification.Philips fse confirmed that since the end of 2020, routine maintenance /preventative maintenance on this device has been performed by the in-house service organization, not philips.A structural engineer through the customer performed an onsite concrete review and investigation which concluded the following: the architectural drawings indicate that a 1 ½¿ topping slab was poured on the 2 ½¿ structural slab.However, the topping slab specified is unclear and presumably is a concrete like material that may be inferior to concrete, with unknown strength and bonding characteristics.Typically, topping slabs are not considered structural and are usually specified for floor levelling and as a subbase for floor finishes.The structural engineer recommended to install a through bolt anchor.Per the installation record for this device, the system was properly secured during installation in 2018 by philips.Philips site preparation document stated that ¿the customer their structural engineer of record and builder/contractor assumes all risks and liability in these cases¿.Specifically, the requirement for anchoring has been stated in site preparation document.Also, according to the site preparation drawing by installation team and signed by customer, stated customer is responsible for floor strength.The philips fse then worked with customer's structural engineer and implemented the recommendation of the structural engineer by installing a through bolt anchor.The structural engineer reviewed the site and approved it.Probable cause: customer concrete strength does not meet specification.Based on the conclusion of this event, it is considered not reportable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INGENUITY CT
Type of Device
SYSTEM, X-RAY, TOMOGRAPHY, COMPUTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V.
veenpluis 4-6
best 5684 PC
NL  5684 PC
Manufacturer (Section G)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V.
veenpluis 4-6
best 5684 PC
NL   5684 PC
Manufacturer Contact
beth johnson
veenpluis 4-6
best 5684 -PC
NL   5684 PC
MDR Report Key15334262
MDR Text Key299048343
Report Number3015777306-2022-00006
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JAK
UDI-Device Identifier00884838059498
UDI-Public00884838059498
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K160743
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/01/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Model NumberINGENUITY CORE 64
Device Catalogue Number728321
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/04/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-