• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT PRO PLUS DCS; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT PRO PLUS DCS; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number D-EVPROP23-29
Device Problems Failure to Advance (2524); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Great Vessel Perforation (2152)
Event Date 08/25/2022
Event Type  Death  
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during implant of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, while crossing a calcified aortic arch, it became difficult to advance the delivery catheter system (dcs).Three attempts were made to advance the dcs.The dcs perforated the aortic arch and the blood pressure decreased.Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cpr) was initiated.The patient noted they did not want open heart surgery performed.As a result, no treatment options were available.Subsequently, the patient died.Per the physician, the cause of death was hypotension caused by bleeding.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: no product was returned.Conclusion: without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: the delivery catheter system (dcs) was discarded by the customer and as such no analysis could be performed.Procedural images were not provided for review.A device history record (dhr) review of the dcs noted no correlations/issues identified regarding manufacturing.The device was manufactured per approved and released manufacturing processes and the device met all applicable manufacturing specifications prior to release for distribution.The dhr review did not show any findings related to this event.The reported event indicated that while crossing a calcified aortic arch, it became difficult to advance the dcs.Difficulties advancing the dcs through the access vessel is known to be related to factors such as patient anatomy and physician technique.In this case, it was noted that there was calcification of the aortic arch.This indicated that the probable cause of the advancement difficulties was patient anatomy.Advancement difficulties do not typically indicate a device malfunction or a failure to meet manufacturing specifications.Three attempts were made to advance the dcs.The dcs perforated the aortic arch and the blood pressure decreased.Vascular access related complications, such as perforation, are known potential adverse patient effects per the evolut pro+ system instructions for use (ifu), and are typically related to patient factors (anatomy, comorbidities, etc.), and/or procedural effects (sheath used, user technique, puncture cut location, etc.).Hypotension is a known potential adverse effect per device ifu.It is an effect that is highly dependent on the patient's pre-procedural condition and can occur despite a normally functioning device or model implant procedure.Death is a known potential adverse patient effect per the evolut pro+ system ifu and is typically related to patient factors (anatomy, comorbidities, etc.), and/or procedural effects (sheath used, user technique, puncture cut location, etc.).Per the physician, the cause of death was hypotension caused by bleeding.There was no information to suggest a device malfunction or a failure to meet specifications that may have caused or contributed to this event.Updated data: h6 method, result, conclusion codes medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUT PRO PLUS DCS
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key15334750
MDR Text Key299047603
Report Number2025587-2022-02432
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/22/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/01/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/05/2023
Device Model NumberD-EVPROP23-29
Device Catalogue NumberD-EVPROP23-29
Device Lot Number0011248723
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/16/2022
Date Device Manufactured06/05/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death; Life Threatening;
Patient Age84 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-