• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION UPHOLD VAGINAL SUPPORT SYSTEM; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, TRANSVAGIN

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION UPHOLD VAGINAL SUPPORT SYSTEM; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, TRANSVAGIN Back to Search Results
Model Number M0068317080
Device Problem Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problems Erosion (1750); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Inflammation (1932); Scar Tissue (2060)
Event Date 07/26/2011
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event was approximated to (b)(6), 2011, the date the sling was implanted, as no event date was reported.This event was reported by the patient's legal representative.The implant surgeon is: (b)(6).The revision surgeon is: (b)(6).(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an uphold vaginal support system was implanted during an anterior repair with uphold mesh, posterior repair, cystoscopy, and perineoplasty procedure performed on (b)(6), 2011.The patient had rectocele, cystocele, and uterine prolapse.Post-operative findings showed a grade iii cystocele and a grade ii rectocele with a gaping introitus.On cystoscopy, there was bilateral fill and spill of the ureteral orifices with blue dye into the bladder and no evidence of mesh or bladder defect.On (b)(6) 2017, the patient underwent excision of a vaginal foreign body (permanent suture), excision of granulation tissue, and unplanned excision of vaginal mesh.The patient had a previous mesh procedure placed at an outside hospital.She had undergone resection of some of the mesh at a different outside hospital, and for the last 4 years she had vaginal bleeding that had been addressed by multiple clinicians in the clinic setting.Furthermore, there was extensive vaginal granulation tissue at the patient's right apex of the vagina just lateral to the cervix, and a braided foreign body suture was also observed.The patient had a mesh contraction in the midline and a mesh erosion in the midline, but these were not symptomatic.The patient was desirous of addressing just the part of the procedure that was contributing to her vaginal bleeding, her biggest complaint.Additionally, the specimens, including the excised suture, granulation tissue, and mesh, were sent to pathology.On (b)(6), 2018, the patient underwent vaginal excision of mesh and granulation tissue, requiring one and a half hours of dissection.The patient who had chronic granulation from a foreign body was thought to have only a permanent suture; however, upon removing this permanent suture, it was discovered that she had an extensive mesh, and the most superficial vaginal mesh was excised to prevent her symptoms from worsening with postmenopausal bleeding.The mesh and granulation tissue erosion recurred and extensive mesh with erosion and tightening across the entire vaginal apex were felt.Therefore, the second vaginal mesh excision was done on the patient.In addition, the multiple excised pieces of mesh were sent to pathology.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Block h11: block h5 patient code has been corrected.Block b3 date of event: date of event was approximated to (b)(6) 2011, the date the sling was implanted, as no event date was reported.Block e1: this event was reported by the patient's legal representative.The implant surgeon is: dr.(b)(6).(b)(6).The revision surgeon is: dr.(b)(6).(b)(6).Block h6: patient codes e2006, e2326 and e0506 capture the reportable events of erosion (foreign body in vagina), inflammation (granulation tissue) and hemorrhage/bleeding (vaginal bleeding).Impact code f1905: device revision or replacement has been used to capture excision of vaginal mesh.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an uphold vaginal support system was implanted during an anterior repair with uphold mesh, posterior repair, cystoscopy, and perineoplasty procedure performed on (b)(6) 2011.The patient had rectocele, cystocele, and uterine prolapse.Post-operative findings showed a grade iii cystocele and a grade ii rectocele with a gaping introitus.On cystoscopy, there was bilateral fill and spill of the ureteral orifices with blue dye into the bladder and no evidence of mesh or bladder defect.On (b)(6) 2017, the patient underwent excision of a vaginal foreign body (permanent suture), excision of granulation tissue, and unplanned excision of vaginal mesh.The patient had a previous mesh procedure placed at an outside hospital.She had undergone resection of some of the mesh at a different outside hospital, and for the last 4 years she had vaginal bleeding that had been addressed by multiple clinicians in the clinic setting.Furthermore, there was extensive vaginal granulation tissue at the patient's right apex of the vagina just lateral to the cervix, and a braided foreign body suture was also observed.The patient had a mesh contraction in the midline and a mesh erosion in the midline, but these were not symptomatic.The patient was desirous of addressing just the part of the procedure that was contributing to her vaginal bleeding, her biggest complaint.Additionally, the specimens, including the excised suture, granulation tissue, and mesh, were sent to pathology.On (b)(6) 2018, the patient underwent vaginal excision of mesh and granulation tissue, requiring one and a half hours of dissection.The patient who had chronic granulation from a foreign body was thought to have only a permanent suture; however, upon removing this permanent suture, it was discovered that she had an extensive mesh, and the most superficial vaginal mesh was excised to prevent her symptoms from worsening with postmenopausal bleeding.The mesh and granulation tissue erosion recurred and extensive mesh with erosion and tightening across the entire vaginal apex were felt.Therefore, the second vaginal mesh excision was done on the patient.In addition, the multiple excised pieces of mesh were sent to pathology.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UPHOLD VAGINAL SUPPORT SYSTEM
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, TRANSVAGIN
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
FREUDENBERG MEDICAL MIS INC
2301 centennial boulevard
jeffersonville IN 47130
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key15382297
MDR Text Key299508443
Report Number3005099803-2022-05086
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OTP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K081048
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/12/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/08/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2014
Device Model NumberM0068317080
Device Catalogue Number831-708
Device Lot Number1ML1022205
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/16/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/23/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age59 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-