• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA CAPIOX RX25 OXYGENATOR; OXYGENATOR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA CAPIOX RX25 OXYGENATOR; OXYGENATOR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CX*RX05RW
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/18/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Weight: 8.Implanted date: device was not implanted.Explanted date: device was not explanted.The actual device has not been returned for evaluation.The investigation is currently ongoing.A follow-up report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.Review of the manufacturing record and the shipping inspection record of the actual product confirmed that there were not any indications of anomaly in them.A search of the complaint file found no other similar report for the involved product code/lot number combination.Terumo medical products (tmp) (importer) registration no: (b)(4) is submitting this report on behalf of ashitaka factory of (b)(4) corporation (manufacturer) registration no.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The user facility reported that the sampling line tube of the capiox device involved fractured at the joint with reservoir port.The final patient impact was not harmed.The event occurred pre-treatment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted as follow up no.1 to provide the device return date in section d9, and to provide the completed investigation results.Visual inspection of the actual sample found that the sampling line and the thermistor probe had been damaged as in the provided image.The provided image was confirmed.It was found that the sampling line connected to the venous blood inlet port of reservoir was damaged.In addition, although there was no description in the reported issue, it was found that the thermistor probe was damaged at the root.Magnifying and electron microscopic inspections of the damaged surface of actual sampling line found that the damaged surface had streak patterns.Therefore, it was inferred that the sampling line was damaged (torn) due to some force.Magnifying and electron microscopic inspections of the damaged surface of actual thermistor probe found that the damaged surface had a smooth shape.Therefore, it was inferred that the damage was caused by an instantaneous force.We have experienced that each similar damage occurred when external force was applied to the product.Shock force was applied to a factory-retained sampling line.It was found that a part of the sampling line was damaged (torn).It was also found that the damaged surface had streak patterns, which was similar to that of the actual sample.Shock force was applied to a factory-retained thermistor probe.It was found that the damaged surface had a smooth shape, which was similar to that of the actual sample.Review of the manufacturing record and the shipping inspection record of the actual sample confirmed that there was not any anomaly in them.A search of the complaint file found no other similar report with the involved product code/lot number combination from the same facility.Based on the investigation result, since the sampling line connected to the venous blood inlet port of reservoir and the thermistor probe was damaged, it was likely that the product was damaged due to some force applied during handling of the product, such as the distribution process and the storage environment.However, it was not possible to identify when the product was damaged from the condition of the actual sample, and it was not possible to clarify the cause.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAPIOX RX25 OXYGENATOR
Type of Device
OXYGENATOR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, 418
JA  418
Manufacturer (Section G)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
reg. no. 9681834
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, 418
JA   418
Manufacturer Contact
gina digioia
reg. no. 2243441
950 elkton blvd.
elkton, MD 21921
6402040886
MDR Report Key15391327
MDR Text Key305990935
Report Number9681834-2022-00181
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTZ
UDI-Device Identifier04987350763471
UDI-Public04987350763471
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K022115
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/09/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/09/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberCX*RX05RW
Device Lot Number210806
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/12/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/06/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age12 MO
Patient SexMale
-
-