Complaint evaluation: based on the evaluation performed by the service engineer, the reported issue was not replicated during evaluation.The service engineer indicated that the device generated the alarm as intended.Customer resolution and conclusion: the service engineer confirmed that the device was operating normally and the device was returned to service.Problem statement: the customer reported that the mx40 monitor failed to generate an alarm for the lower alarm limit for the heart rate (hr) parameter.While there has been no report of patient/user death or serious injury in this case, this event is considered reportable due to the potential that the device may fail to alert users to deterioration of a patient¿s condition.The issue is not associated with a death, serious injury, product design, or labeling deficiency.Was the device being used on a patient at the time of the event, including for the purposes of diagnosis? yes, the device was in use on a patient at the time of event.Was there any adverse event to the patient or user? if yes, describe? no, there was no adverse event reported.If there was an adverse event, did the device cause or contribute to the adverse event, and how? no, there was no adverse event reported.
|