• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. R3 3 HOLE ACET SHELL 56MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. R3 3 HOLE ACET SHELL 56MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS Back to Search Results
Model Number 71335556
Device Problem Premature Separation (4045)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/18/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a thr procedure, the r3 3 hole acet shell 56mm disassociated with insertion handle upon impaction and therefore did not initially get impacted in the proper position.Therefore had to remove.Realized the central hole had cross threaded.Surgery was resumed after a non-significant delay, with a change in surgical technique.Patient was not harmed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The associated device was returned and evaluated.The visual inspection revealed the device shows signs of use during surgery.A dimensional evaluation performed on the device revealed the part to be out of specification for thread form.The product failed one step of final inspection and has visual damage in the threads.The part is non-conforming for thread form.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, the surgical technique does address acetabular shell insertion and notes that close attention should be paid to initial positioning of the r3 shell.As of the date of this medical investigation, the supporting clinical documentation has not been provided; therefore, definitive clinical factors which could have contributed to the reported event could not be concluded.The patient impact beyond the reported shell exchange/modified surgical technique and surgical delay cannot be determined.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.A review made by the quality engineering team revealed that the production documentation including the product assurance data sheet for the device was reviewed.All dimensions were confirmed as within specification and no damage was observed to the thread of any device within batch 22ew15746 on cell checks or final process checks.In order to perform the overall dimensional check the device is screwed onto a mount for measurement, this would not have been possible should damage have been present.The thread gauge check confirmed that the thread was not damaged during manufacture.A thread gauge was used to confirm that the thread mated correctly.Thread gauge was calibrated after 12 months, still in protective coating and had not been issued to production.The calibration was therefore extended for 12 months.No reported issue with any other device from the batch of 17, 13 of which have been sold assumed implanted.All dimensions noted as within specification during manufacture and no damage observed.Based on this evaluation it is believed the device was within manufacturing specifications at the time of production and that this is an isolated incident, which possibly occurred during surgery.No other similar complaints were noted to have occurred relating to warwick produced r3 shells within the last 12 months and no other complaints have been received relating to this batch.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include insertion technique used and/or user/procedural variance.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
R3 3 HOLE ACET SHELL 56MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key15392905
MDR Text Key305411958
Report Number1020279-2022-04035
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MBL
UDI-Device Identifier03596010598264
UDI-Public03596010598264
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/22/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/09/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number71335556
Device Catalogue Number71335556
Device Lot Number22EW15746
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/16/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/31/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-