|
Lot Number UNKNOWN |
Device Problems
Gel Leak (1267); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problems
Bruise/Contusion (1754); Erythema (1840); Unspecified Respiratory Problem (4464); Blister (4537)
|
Event Date 11/22/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Biotel heart distributor notified braemar that a patient alleged that the they experienced a severe reaction to the gel from the patch.She stated that after wearing the patch for a little bit she started feeling symptoms of anaphylactic shock.She also experienced shortness of breath, bruising, skin erythema (breaking out)), and bleeding from the patch site.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This patient called in to complain of a severe reaction to the gel from the patch per her complaint.After wearing the patch for a little bit she started feeling symptoms of anaphylactic shock.She also was experiencing shortness of breath, bruising, broken out, and bleeding from the patch site.She went to the hospital, and they gave her steroids to help.She is currently feeling better but will be removing the device and sending back.She will consult with her doctor first before deciding to continue use of device.Third party manufacturer of electrode was notified of the incident.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Sensor (b)(6)- engineering evaluation was unable to be performed as the device is already with another patient.The device has been functioning as intended and without complaint and due to this it is unlikely that the sensor contributed to the allegation.Electrode (p200672) universal - engineering evaluation was unable to be performed as the device was not returned.Electrode is a single use device and makes continuous contact with a patient's skin.The most probable cause of the skin issue is that the patient experienced a bio-incompatibility event to the electrode adhesive.Marsi, skin burn, and associated symptoms may inherently occur under the course of ecg monitoring.No single factor or combination of factors can be attributable to electrode skin irritation and associated symptoms.The product labeling advises patients of alternate options and other steps to take if skin irritation develops, including healthcare professional contact as needed initially a third party manufacturer was identified as the electrode worn by the patient at the time of the incident.It was discovered that the electrode was actually the universal patch, manufactured by braemar, inc.Third party manufacturer of electrode was notified of the change and that their electrode, although shipped to the patient, was not being worn by the patient at the time of the incident.The electrodes were not available for return by patient as these are single use devices.Patient discontinued usage of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|