• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US FMS VUE II FLUID MANAGEMENT AND TISSUE DEBRIDEMENT SYSTEM; DISTENSION UNIT, FLUID, ARTHROSCOPIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US FMS VUE II FLUID MANAGEMENT AND TISSUE DEBRIDEMENT SYSTEM; DISTENSION UNIT, FLUID, ARTHROSCOPIC Back to Search Results
Model Number 284004
Device Problems Device Remains Activated (1525); Overfill (2404); Improper Flow or Infusion (2954)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/30/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
This is report 4 of 4 for (b)(4).It was reported by the sales rep in switzerland that preoperatively to an unknown surgery on (b)(4) 2022, it was observed that an unknown pump device had no pressure when three tubing devices were connected individually that the chamber overfilled without stopping.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.This report is for an unknown fluid management system device.Part and lot number are unknown.Without the specific part number; the expiration date, udi number, 510-k number, manufacturing site name, and device manufacture date are unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H4: the device manufacture date was reported as unknown on the initial report; and has been updated accordingly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d1, d2, d4, udi: the product code was reported as unknown on the initial report; therefore, the event description, common device name, procode, catalog, serial number, and udi have been updated accordingly.Udi (b)(4).Investigation summary
=
> according to the information provided, it was reported that all tubings were connected correctly.As soon as the pump starts, however, the camera felt without stopping.As if the pump had no pressure.We changed the inflow day set 284508 but the problem was the same with the new tubing, than i changed all tubings and also the pump.The complaint device was received at the service center and evaluated.During the service evaluation, no defects were identified.Hence, this complaint cannot be confirmed.After the service, the device was found to be working according to the specifications.As no defect was found, a potential cause cannot be associated to manufacturing, therefore a manufacturing record evaluation is not required.  as part of depuy mitek¿s quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Since the reported condition is not confirmed and no defects were identified, the root cause for the reported failure cannot be determined.The event described could not be confirmed as the device was returned without detectable damage.Although no product defect was identified, there may have been other circumstances or issues that occurred during the use of the device that could not be replicated during the service evaluation.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.Depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Event Description
This is report 4 of 4 for (b)(4).It was reported by the sales rep in switzerland that preoperatively to an unknown surgery on (b)(6) 2022, it was observed that thefms vue ii fluid management and tissue debridement system device had no pressure when three tubing devices were connected individually that the chamber overfilled without stopping.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FMS VUE II FLUID MANAGEMENT AND TISSUE DEBRIDEMENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
DISTENSION UNIT, FLUID, ARTHROSCOPIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
3035526892
MDR Report Key15411504
MDR Text Key300088861
Report Number1221934-2022-02817
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRX
UDI-Device Identifier10886705027934
UDI-Public10886705027934
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
PMA/PMN Number
K171237
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Study,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/13/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number284004
Device Catalogue Number284004
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/18/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/25/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-