Two (2) cross-connectors were returned to nuvasive.It is unknown which device malfunctioned intra-operatively.Lot number n268872 or n221994.Device msep (b)(6) 2020 or (b)(6) 2018 the complaint devices, two (2) cross-connectors and one (1) 40in-lb torque handle, were evaluated and the reported event was confirmed.The evaluation identified that the locking cams on both connectors exhibited severe deformation to the hexalobe drive features as well as dislocation of the cam component in the arm assemblies.It could not be determined if the damage occurred during the reported locking failure of the device or during removal.However, the torque handle used with the fractured driver was determined to be damaged and out of calibration, allowing excessive torque force to be applied.A review of the device history records was performed and no discrepancies were found.The cause of the device failures was determined to likely be excessive force applied by the damaged handle.Labeling review: ".Potential adverse events and complications: potential risks identified with the use of this system, which may require additional surgery, include: fracture of the vertebra." ".Warnings, cautions and precautions: the implantation of spinal systems should be performed only by experienced spinal surgeons with specific training in the use of this spinal system because this is a technically demanding procedure presenting a risk of serious injury to the patient." ".Pre-operative warnings: care should be used during surgical procedures to prevent damage to the device(s) and injury to the patient." if any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
|
It was reported that that patient underwent an initial posterior fixation procedure.During the procedure, as the surgeon attempted to tighten the locking cam of the cross connector on the rod, the cam spun and was unable to be tightened.Subsequently, the surgeon encountered difficulties in removal of the connector and had to use a leskal to rip the device out of the construct, resulting in a broken pedicle.As a result, the fusion had to be extended.No further patient impact was reported.
|