Correction - h6 (clinical code, device code, results code) the reported event could not be confirmed, since the device was not returned for evaluation and no other evidences were provided.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.The device history record could not be reviewed because the affected device was not returned, and the lot number was not communicated.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Formal medical opinion was sought from an experienced independent medical expert as below.¿the ct-scan shows an infinity tar implanted, the tibial component looks well placed, following the mechanical axis.The implant-bone interface looks in order.The pe-liner could be well depicted by its negative contrast, in the axial images and looks intact, and not disengaged from the tibial tray.The talar component is well-fixed to the talar bone, however, the component (together with the foot) is subluxated posteriorly relative to the tibial component (including the pe-liner).Without further clinical information, the reason(s) behind this substantial subluxation cannot be assessed.This subluxation is without doubt the reason for the necessary revision.¿ if device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.
|