• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 PIPELINE FLEX; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 PIPELINE FLEX; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER Back to Search Results
Model Number PED-450-25
Device Problems Positioning Failure (1158); Unintended Ejection (1234); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 06/02/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Medtronic received information regarding a pipeline that had difficult positioning and became stuck in the phenom 27 microcatheter after resheathing.That patient was undergoing a procedure for flow diverter treatment of an unruptured saccular right internal carotid artery (ica) posterior communicating segment aneurysm.The aneurysm max diameter was 9.8mm and the neck diameter was 6.9mm.Vessel tortuosity was normal.It was reported that the devices were prepared as indicated in the instructions for use (ifu).The catheter was flushed per ifu.The tip of the pipeline opened about 6-8mm but it was observed that the distal anchoring position was not ideal so the pipeline was recovered into the phenom 27 microcatheter.The pipeline was only resheathed one time.When trying to deploy the pipeline against, it was found the pipeline was stuck in the phenom 27 microcatheter.After various adjustment attempts, the devices still could not be used normally so they were withdrawn together from the patient's body.A new pipeline and phenom microcatheter were then used to complete the surgery successfully without issue.After the surgery was completed, the complaint pipeline and phenom were inspected and the pipeline pushwire was able to be removed from the phenom 27 microcatheter.The pipeline stent remained in the microcatheter and was observed under dsa to be in trapped in the proximal end of the microcatheter.Attempts were made to remove the pipeline stent from the phenom 27 microcatheter but attempts were unsuccessful.There was no harm or injury to the patient.Additional information received reported that the resistance was in the catheter tip.There was no damage to the pipeline pushwire or catheter observed, and the pushwire was not rotated or pulled back at any time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr: product analysis: equipment used: vis (m-85519), 203cm ruler (m-83361) as found condition: the pipeline flex embolization device and phenom 27 catheter were returned for analysis within a shipping box.The pipeline flex embolization device was returned within a plastic bio-pouch, within an opened pipeline flex outer carton (b305150), and within an opened pipeline flex inner pouch (b305150).The phenom 27 catheter was returned within a plastic bio-pouch, within an opened phenom 27 outer carton (se21-047), and within an opened phenom 27 inner pouch (se21-047).Visual inspection/damage location details: no bends or kinks were found with the pipeline flex pusher.The pusher distal hypotube was found stretched with the shrink tubing pulled back from the proximal bumper.The pusher was found detached at the distal hypotube weld (solder joint).The detached distal segment of the pusher was found still within the introducer sheath.The detached pusher was removed from within the introducer sheath.The pusher distal core wire and tip coil were found bent.The phenom 27 catheter was examined.The catheter hub was found in good condition.The catheter body was found kinked at ~60.0cm from the distal tip.The catheter distal tip was found in good condition.The phenom 27 catheter was flushed, water exited from the distal tip.An in-house mandrel was inserted through the phenom 27 catheter and the pipeline flex braid was pushed out from within the hub.The braid proximal and distal ends were open, but damaged (frayed).Testing/analysis: the detached pipeline flex pusher was sent out for sem (scanning electron micrographic) / eds (energy dispersive spectroscopy) elemental and failure analysis.The elemental analysis of the detached pusher end shows the presence of tin (sn).Conclusion: based on the device analysis and reported information, the customer¿s ¿resistance during re-sheathing/failure to resheath¿, ¿resistance/stuck during delivery¿ and ¿device opens prematurely¿ reports were confirmed.Damage to the pipeline flex delivery system (distal core wire/tip coil/stretching) and braid (fraying) can occur if the device is advanced/retrieved against resistance.Possible causes of resistance during re-sheathing/failure to resheath include patient vessel tortuosity, resistance during delivery/retrieval, catheter damage, user does not maintain continuous flush, or user resheaths more than 2 times.Possible causes of resistance/stuck during delivery include use of an incompatible catheter, catheter damage, patient vessel tortuosity, user does not maintain continuous flush, or users pulls back on/torques wire while advancing pipeline in microcatheter.The phenom 27 catheter is compatible for use with the pipeline flex embolization device, the patient¿s vessel tortuosity was ¿normal¿, there was no reported resistance during the initial delivery, the pipeline was only resheathed one time, and the pushwire was not rotated or pulled back at any time.Information regarding if a continuous flush was maintained was not reported.It is possible the damage (kinking) found with the returned phenom 27 catheter contributed to the events.However, the cause for the catheter damage could not be determined.Regarding the solder joint separation issue, separation can occur due to excessive force or inadequate solder/tinning.The analysis showed presence of soldering material (tin); thereby indicating that the soldering was conducted.The proof load of 2.5n performed on 100% of the devices (section starting with hypotube solder to distal pad solder joint).There was no non-conformance to specification that led to the detachment issue.Furthermore, the review of lot history records shows that the finished device has met all manufacturing requirements and specifications during final assembly and quality inspection.The event is reported at this time based on analysis results which indicated a reportable event.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PIPELINE FLEX
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key15497016
MDR Text Key306419428
Report Number2029214-2022-01635
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OUT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P100018
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/27/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/28/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberPED-450-25
Device Catalogue NumberPED-450-25
Device Lot NumberB305150
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/08/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/13/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/30/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age65 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-