The fabius gsp workstation as well as the anesthetic gas vaporizer have been evaluated on-site by a dräger service engineer.The vaporizer did not exhibit any deviations from specification; a non-conformity was found with the anesthesia workstation but this cannot be put in causal connection to the reported issue.The hospital's biomed provided a photo from which it coud clearly be derived that the particular vaporizer was incorrectly mounted during the concerned procedure.This has obviously led to a leakage at the vaporizer interface.As a result, the patient was not receiving (enough) anesthetic gas in which consequence she/he woke up.After having received this information the service engineer was again checking the ports of both vaporizer and fabius workstation; the inspection did not reveal any nonconformities; it can be excluded that a technical issue with the vaporizer mount has contributed to the event.Dräger finally concludes that a chain of use errors has led to the reported event and to the consequences the patient experienced.The ifu of both vaporizer and anesthesia machine refer in detail to the correct mounting of the vaporizer.The conduction of a pre-use check is strongly recommended whereby the tilting of the device was possible to detect.Furthermore, there were indications during the course of event from which it was possible to derive that the patient did not receive the intended concentration of anesthetic vapor - the users reported that the smell of agent was recognized and, a patient gas monitoring system of non-dräger brand was in use.
|