Investigation results: visual: at first sight it could be determined that the tip of the instrument was broken.The irrigation and suction channel is broken about 5 mm after the distal end.The tip of the needle shows pressure marks as well as on the shaft and on the cutting edge.The material around the fracture site shows deformations indicating a so-called vibration fracture.The fracture surface of both parts shows no anomalies such as blowholes or foreign body inclusions.Due to the small dimensions/diameter of the device, a detailed analysis of the fracture surface is difficult.Batch history review: due to the fact that no lot number was provided, a review of the device history records for the complained device is not possible.The review of risk assessment revealed that the overall risk level (severity 3(5) x probability 1(5) of occurrence) according to din en iso 14971 is still acceptable.Explanation and rationale: there are no indications of a material or manufacturing defect.Based on our internal investigation, we assume that the tube was crushed and subsequently suffered a fatigue fracture, probably due to purpose alienation with a subsequent overload situation.Conclusion and measures / preventive measures: based upon the investigation results, the root cause is most probably usage-related.Based upon the investigation results, a capa is not necessary.
|