Patient is subject in the on-x post approval study.On (b)(6) 2022 weakness of the left leg and headache.Felt some sensation on left side yesterday with headache.No collapse or head injury.No chest pain, sob, nausea, vomiting or abdominal pain, no urinary symptoms.Pmhx micro-haemorrhage under neurology, stroke (reported by pt), heart valve replacement.Lives alone.Symptoms are worsening of current symptoms and not new.Under neuro for micro haemorrhages advised d/c home.Adjudication form received.This event is related to the product.This investigation is relegated to onxane-23, (b)(4).Event date on (b)(6) 2022.
|
According to initial reports, patient in the on-x low dose post approval registry, ¿felt some sensation on left side yesterday with headache.Reported feeling weakness in left leg.No collapse or head injury.No chest pain, sob, nausea, vomiting or abdo pain, no urinary symptoms.Pmhx micro-haemorrhage under neurology, stroke (reported by pt), heart valve replacement shx lives alone, self-caring o/e a moa b spo2 98% ra, rr 18, c bp 151/96, pr 79, hs 1+2 d gcs 15/15 e temp 36.1 cns - power 4-5/5 on left limbs, 5/5 on right limbspatient is not for stroke input due to extensive neuro history.Symptoms are worsening of current symptoms and not new.Under neuro for micro haemorrhages d/w dr karun ed cons, advised d/c home¿ inr at time of event 1.8.This investigation is relegated to the onxane-23 sn (b)(6) , event date (b)(6) 2022.The manufacturing records for the onxane-23 sn (b)(6) were reviewed by quality assurance/quality control (qa/qc) and it was confirmed that all records were controlled, available for review, and met all specifications per the device master record.All lots passed functional testing and met release specifications.A review of the available information was performed.On (b)(6) 2019 onxane-23 sn (b)(6) was implanted in the aortic position in a 56-year-old male patient who was subsequently enrolled in the on-x low dose post approval study (pas).On (b)(6) 2022 three events were reported to the sponsor, of those events two were adjudicated as valve related.The two valve related events occurred on (b)(6) 2022 recorded as a complaint of ¿weakness of left leg and headache¿ and on (b)(6) 2022 recorded as a complaint of ¿headache and left side weakness¿.The third event deemed non-valve related occurred on (b)(6) 2022 and was recorded as ¿patent deliberately cut left wrist¿.On (b)(6) 2022 (957 days post implant) the patient reported to the accident and emergency department with the complaint of ¿left leg giving way and numb and weak since this morning when he wakes up, headache yesterday, h/o cva 3-4 months ago¿.He was evaluated by the stroke team, labs and ct of the head were performed and he was discharged home with a note in the file ¿symptoms are worsening of current symptoms and not new¿.The ct of the head showed ¿no significant intracranial abnormality¿ and none of the lab work results were provided, however an inr of 1.8 was provided when reported to the sponsor.The event was adjudicated as ¿hospitalization with tia, no cva, te event¿ and ¿valve related¿.On (b)(6) 2022 (1,003 days post implant) the patient reported to the accident and emergency department with the complaint of ¿headache and left side weakness¿ and it is noted that this patient has had multiple admissions with similar symptoms.He was admitted to the inpatient unit and evaluated by the stroke consultant, and an mri and ct of the head were both performed with no acute intracranial findings.No inr was provided at the time of his admission; however, his discharge notes state that his inr on discharge was 2 with a target inr of 1.8, range of 1.5-2.0.That range is appropriate for a participant in the pas (target inr 1.5 ¿ 2.0).His discharge diagnosis was ¿probable functional weakness¿ and it is also noted in the patient education section of his discharge summary that the ¿diagnosis of probable functional weakness¿ due to a number of issues? migraine? stress and anxiety.We explained that he has not had a stroke¿.He was referred to neurology for follow up and the evaluation was completed on 21mar2022 and stated in the notes ¿he has had an mri scan of the brain showing no significant abnormalities, although the referral stated that he had micro-hemorrhages.I have reviewed the scan today and there was no evidence of micro-bleeds.I understand that the symptoms were thought to be of functional nature¿ the event was adjudicated as ¿hospitalized with tia, cva ruled out, considered te event¿ and ¿valve related¿.The instructions for use [ifu] for the on-x valve lists thromboembolism as a potential adverse event for mechanical prosthetic valve recipients.If thromboembolism is the underlying cause of the tia, it occurs at a historical rate of 3.0% per patient-year for rigid heart valves [iso 5840:2021[e].Probable tia, possibly valve related due to the requirement for anticoagulation, but could also be related to or exacerbated by previous cva or diagnosis of probable functional weakness.No further action is required.Based on the available information, a definitive root cause for this event cannot be determined.However, probable tia, possibly valve related due to the requirement for anticoagulation, but could also be related to or exacerbated by previous cva or diagnosis of probable functional weakness.The manufacturing records were reviewed, and it was confirmed that all records were controlled, available for review, and met all specifications per the device master record.All lots passed functional testing and met release specifications.This event does not identify additional hazards or modify the probability and severity of existing hazards.There is no indication that an error or deficiency occurred at artivion ¿ formerly cryolife/jotec and the ifu adequately communicates risk.Artivion will continue to monitor similar complaints to determine if additional actions are warranted; however, no further action is warranted at this time.
|