Manufacturer¿s investigation conclusion: review of the submitted photograph confirmed damage to the driveline's outer jacket; however, the reported event of exposed driveline wiring could not be confirmed.The submitted photograph captured a portion of the patient¿s external driveline.Damage to the outer jacket was observed adjacent to the proximal end of the existing driveline repair.It should be noted that no exposed wires were observed.The submitted log file contained events from 24sep2022 through 29sep2022, per the timestamps.Silenced driveline fault alarms were captured throughout the majority of the file.Based on previous complaint experience, the alarms appeared consistent with a potential driveline issue.No other notable events or alarms were captured.The pump operated at or above the low speed limit for the duration of the file.The patient remains ongoing on heartmate ii left ventricular assist system (lvas), serial number (b)(6), with no further reported issues at this time.The heartmate ii lvas instructions for use (ifu) and patient handbook discuss wear and tear to the driveline, contain information on caring for the driveline, and provide possible indications of driveline damage as well as how to respond to such events.The ifu also outlines all system controller alarms, including the driveline fault, and how to respond to each alarm condition.The relevant sections of the device history records for (b)(6), original driveline, serial number (b)(6), and replacement driveline, serial number (b)(6), were reviewed and showed no deviations from manufacturing or quality assurance specification.No further information was provided.The manufacturer is closing the file on this event.
|