Catalog Number 22-4038 |
Device Problem
Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 09/15/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a shoulder arthroscopy procedure, when passing the first stitch of the firstpass, the clamp got stuck, it did not recover and became very stiff.It was necessary to open it with force, the stitches remained in a secured position and were not recovered.The procedure was successfully completed with a surgical delay of more than 31 minutes using the same device.No further complications were reported.The health status of the patient is stable.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: h3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the device and the reported event.A visual inspection of the returned instrument shows no manufacturing abnormalities.The right side of the suture capture is out of place.Product was out of the original packaging.No packaging returned.A functional evaluation revealed the needle will deploy when trigger is initiated.The suture capture does not consistently capture the sutures due to the defect.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.The complaint was confirmed and the root cause was associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include: (1) tissue thickness (2) damage or debris on the device tip between passes.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: the reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.There was no relationship found between the device and the reported event.The complaint was not confirmed.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|