|
Model Number 5393190 |
Device Problems
Fracture (1260); Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Separation (1562); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 09/15/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiration date: 09/2023).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that seven months and nineteen days post catheter placement procedure on the right side, the catheter allegedly broken during removal leaving the inner end inside the patient chest cavity.It was further reported that the physician did a cut down to remove the catheter.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that seven months and nineteen days post catheter placement procedure on the right side, the catheter allegedly broken during removal leaving the inner end inside the patient chest cavity.It was further reported that the physician did a cut down to remove the catheter.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one 19cm glidepath d/l catheter in two segments was returned for evaluation.Functional, gross visual, tactile, and microscopic visual evaluations were performed.The investigation is confirmed for the reported fracture and the identified material separation issues, as a complete circumferential break was noted on the distal end of the catheter.A complete circumferential break was noted on the proximal end of the distal catheter segment.The surface of the complete circumferential break on the distal end of the catheter was noted to be glossy and granular.The surface of the complete circumferential break on the proximal end of the distal catheter segment was noted to be glossy.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiration date: 09/2023).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that seven months and nineteen days post catheter placement procedure on the right side, the catheter allegedly broken during removal leaving the inner end inside the patient chest cavity.It was further reported that catheter was allegedly difficult to remove due to tissue growth over the catheter.Reportedly the physician did a cut down to remove the catheter.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one 19cm glidepath d/l catheter in two segments was returned for evaluation.Functional, gross visual, tactile, and microscopic visual evaluations were performed.Manufacturing site evaluation of the sample found the catheter was broken.The investigation is confirmed for the reported fracture and material separation issues, as a complete circumferential break was noted on the distal end of the catheter.A complete circumferential break was noted on the proximal end of the distal catheter segment.The surface of the complete circumferential break on the distal end of the catheter was noted to be glossy and granular.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported patient-device incompatibility and difficult to remove issue as the exact circumstances at the time of the reported event cannot be verified.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: b5, d4 (expiration date: 09/2023).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|