The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.As there was no damage noted to the device during the inspection prior to use, the investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure as it is likely that during deployment interaction with the heavily calcified and heavily torturous anatomy resulted in preventing the shaft lumens from moving freely; thus resulting in the reported physical resistance (resistance with the handle).Interaction with the heavily calcified, heavily torturous anatomy and/or manipulation of the device during stent deployment resulted in the stent to jump on deployment (reported stent malposition).There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|