Model Number CMS15-10C-US |
Device Problems
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 09/29/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a device tip detachment occurred.A sentinel cerebral protection system (cps) was prepared for use during a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) procedure.The sentinel cps was loaded onto a non-boston scientific (bsc) guidewire and advanced towards the radial sheath.Before entering the body of the patient it was observed the distal tip of the sentinel cps was detached from the device.The device was removed from the non-bsc guidewire and a second sentinel cps was used to complete the procedure.No patient complications were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a device tip detachment occurred.A sentinel cerebral protection system (cps) was prepared for use during a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) procedure.The sentinel cps was loaded onto a non-boston scientific (bsc) guidewire and advanced towards the radial sheath.Before entering the body of the patient it was observed the distal tip of the sentinel cps was detached from the device.The device was removed from the non-bsc guidewire and a second sentinel cps was used to complete the procedure.No patient complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3 device evaluated by mfr: the returned product consisted of a sentinel cerebral protection system (cps) which underwent visual and microscopic inspection.Visual inspection revealed the proximal filter was sheathed, the articulating distal sheath was relaxed, the distal filter was unsheathed, the distal filter slider (#3) was kinked, and the distal tip was detached and not returned.During microscopic inspection a small section of the distal tip tri-layer was found still attached to the coupler.The residual tri-layer bond to the coupler was well adhered.Product analysis confirmed the reported event of tip detachment as the distal tip was not returned with the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|