• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PERFUSION SYSTEMS AFFINITY CP PUMP; PUMP, BLOOD, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS, NON-ROLLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PERFUSION SYSTEMS AFFINITY CP PUMP; PUMP, BLOOD, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS, NON-ROLLE Back to Search Results
Model Number BBAP40
Device Problems Crack (1135); Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Material Puncture/Hole (1504)
Patient Problem Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
Event Date 09/19/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: visual inspection showed a crack at the base of the qb-inlet port.Pressure integrity testing was performed at 22 psig of air pressure with the device placed under water.During the test there was a leak observed from the base of the qb-inlet port.The reason for return was confirmed.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during use of a custom tubing pack, it was reported that after priming and the arterial line was connected, a small volume of fluid was given before going on bypass.The customer observed that before going on bypass, a small amount of fluid was under the centrifugal pump head.The customer inspected the centrifugal pump head and observed what appeared to be a leak from a crack at the tip of the head.The device was replaced by the customer changing the pump head out and the rest of the circuit was used without any further incident to complete the procedure.There was no additional patient impact associated with this event.Medtronic received additional information that the same leak did not appear in multiple custom tubing packs.There were no visible air in system/tubing.The patient lost 10ml of blood at most as a result of this leak.No transfusion was required.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: the complaint was confirmed for a leak from a crack in the bbap40 centrifugal pump.Visual inspection of the returned device showed a crack at the base of the inlet port.For performance analysis pressure integrity testing was performed at 22 psig of air pressure with the device placed under water.During the test there was a leak observed from the base of the inlet port.The medtronic core technologies team was consulted.The complaint device and control devices were submitted for additional analysis.Optical analysis of the complaint device did not show an obvious root cause initiation such as knit line origins (improper mold fill), voids, bubbles, or occlusions in the bulk, foreign material (fm), or impact damage.Fracture lines on a control device caused by a violent upward strike on a solid surface were in similar location to the complaint device port cracks, suggesting the port cracks were caused by an upward stress.Infrared spectroscopy results showed the polycarbonate housing on the complaint device was consistent with a control device; there was no evidence of chemical degradation in the complaint device.Trends for issues with this product are reviewed at quarterly quality meetings.Correction h6 (device code/fdd/annex a): this field has been updated.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AFFINITY CP PUMP
Type of Device
PUMP, BLOOD, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS, NON-ROLLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
PERFUSION SYSTEMS
7611 northland dr
brooklyn park MN 55428
Manufacturer (Section G)
PERFUSION SYSTEMS
7611 northland dr
brooklyn park MN 55428
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key15625421
MDR Text Key306892726
Report Number2184009-2022-00274
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KFM
UDI-Device Identifier20613994647850
UDI-Public20613994647850
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
K191077
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/26/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/18/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/05/2023
Device Model NumberBBAP40
Device Catalogue NumberBBAP40
Device Lot Number223247737
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/14/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/13/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/23/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-