• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARJO (SUZHOU) CO., LTD. AUTO LOGIC; MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARJO (SUZHOU) CO., LTD. AUTO LOGIC; MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE Back to Search Results
Model Number 630001
Device Problem Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
Patient Problems Fall (1848); Head Injury (1879)
Event Date 10/06/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Arjo became aware of an event involving an arjo auto logic system and non-arjo bed frame (casa med classic low).It was claimed by the customer representative that a patient fell from the mattress over the raised side rail.The mattress was allegedly 1.5 inches (3.8cm) too high.The bump on the patient's head was reported as an outcome of this event.An ambulance was called but after the patient's assessment, a transfer to a hospital was deemed unnecessary.The pump and the mattress were inspected by an arjo representative and no faults were found.The system met the performance specifications.No mattress over-inflation was found.A rental supervisor visited the facility.At the time of the visit at the customer site, anything additional (pillows, stuff) that would cause the patient to fall out of the bed was observed.Arjo received access to the non-arjo bed frame instructions operating manual (casa med classic low, 19749gwbe).This document includes information about the allowed dimension of the mattresses that can be used with this bed frame.The allowed height of the mattress equals 12cm.The height of auto logic mattress equals 20.5cm.Comparing this data, it was concluded that the arjo mattress was too height (exceeding the allowed height of the mattress).In a result, the insufficient distance between the top surface of the mattress and the top of the side rails occurred and the patient fell over the closed side rail.The arjo mattress involved in the event met performance specifications however it was incompatible with the non-arjo bed frame.The patient fell from the arjo mattress, therefore, the arjo product was directly involved in the reported incident.The complaint was assessed as reportable due to the patient fall from the mattress what resulted in injury.
 
Event Description
Arjo became aware of an event involving an arjo auto logic system and non-arjo bed frame (casa med classic low).It was claimed by the customer representative that a patient fell from the mattress over the raised side rail.The mattress was allegedly 1.5 inches (3.8 cm) too height.The bump on the patient's head was reported as an outcome of this event.An ambulance was called but after the patient's assessment, a transfer to a hospital was deemed unnecessary.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTO LOGIC
Type of Device
MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARJO (SUZHOU) CO., LTD.
no. 158 fangzhou road, sip
suzhou, jiangsu 21502 4
CH  215024
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARJO (SUZHOU) CO., LTD.
no. 158 fangzhou road, sip
suzhou, jiangsu 21502 4
CH   215024
Manufacturer Contact
justyna kielbowska
ks. wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki 62-05-2
PL   62-052
883337089
MDR Report Key15690709
MDR Text Key305993974
Report Number3005619970-2022-00024
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FNM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Administrator/Supervisor
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/28/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/28/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Model Number630001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/06/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/25/2013
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient SexMale
-
-