Coloplast has not been provided any corroborating evidence to verify the information contained in this report.Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
As reported to coloplast, though not verified, legal representative stated the patient with this device experienced bothersome sexual intercourse for spouse, spouse states he feels a brillo pad sensation, device erosion through vagina mostly right posterior area, vaginal pain, feels residual device in vagina causing dyspareunia for herself, bilateral flank pain, urinary retention, urinary hesitancy, low intermittent stream, positional voiding and must lean forward to fully empty bladder, valsalva voiding, chronic cystitis, sensation of incomplete bladder emptying, postcoital vaginal bleeding and discharge, bladder pain, chronic and intermittent dysuria.Patient had an emergency department visit and hospital admission for e.Coli, urosepsis, pyelonephritis, acute on chronic kidney disease.Patient had a subsequent emergency department visit for mixed gram-positive flora and pyelonephritis.Patient had a pelvic examination under anesthesia, cystoscopy and a partial explantation of the device.Patient had an exam that noted a 1 cm right anterior vaginal wall device erosion.She had a urodynamics test that noted incomplete bladder emptying.Patient had a second examination and partial explantation of the device with attached suture, excision of scarred vaginal mucosa; cystocele, rectocele, and enterocele repair; soft tissue reconstruction of the bladder neck, trimming of excess vaginal mucosa, and cystoscopy under anesthesia.
|