A journal article was reviewed that contained information regarding epicardial implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) leads.The article reports sudden deaths which occurred during the follow up period.The deaths were not attributed to lead malfunctions, but they could not entirely rule it out whether a failed shock might have been the cause of death.There were lead malfunctions which included fractures and fluid within the lead insulation and were diagnosed via x-ray.The leads exhibited oversensing, failure to pace/capture, lack of defibrillation, or high impedance.Leads were revised or unknown intervention was performed.The status/disposition of the leads is unknown.No patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.
|
This information is based entirely on journal literature.Medtronic was made aware of this event through a search of literature publications.Of note, multiple patients and multiple manufacturers were noted in the article; however, a one-to-one correlation could not be made with unique product serial/lot numbers.The baseline gender/age characteristics is male/62 years old.The model listed in the report is a representative of the model family, as there is no specific model listed.Without a lot number or device serial number, the manufacturing date cannot be determined.Since no device id was provided, it is unknown if this event has been previously reported.A request for additional information will be made and upon receipt a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.Referenced article: high failure rate for an epicardial implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead: implications for long-term follow-up of patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.Journal of the american college of cardiology.1998; 31(3):616¿22.Doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00529-9.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|