Model Number 101-9810 |
Device Problem
Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/07/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an indirect decompression (id) implant procedure, the physician had implanted the spacer at the incorrect vertebral level.Upon extracting it, the physician broke the implant, damaging the spindle cap.It is unknown if the inserter was properly connected to the implant.The broken spacer was removed and a different sized spacer was used at the correct vertebral level to complete the procedure successfully.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Correction made to block b2.Device analysis performed on the returned indirect decompression spacer was unable to confirm the reported event of damage to the implant or spindle cap.The implant exhibitied normal device characteristics during testing.A labeling review did not reveal any anomalies as it states to not force deployment and avoid application of excessive force onto the device or implant breakage may result.Therefore, engineers concluded that there was no problem detected with the returned device.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an indirect decompression (id) implant procedure, the physician had implanted the spacer at the incorrect vertebral level.Upon extracting it, the physician broke the implant, damaging the spindle cap.It is unknown if the inserter was properly connected to the implant.The broken spacer was removed and a different sized spacer was used at the correct vertebral level to complete the procedure successfully.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|