|
Model Number 2102 |
Device Problem
Expulsion (2933)
|
Patient Problems
Wound Dehiscence (1154); Erythema (1840); Hematoma (1884); Unspecified Infection (1930)
|
Event Date 10/06/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
While analysis was unable to be performed as the device was not returned, per the opinion of the physician, the root cause of the event was the external trauma in the device area.The device history record and sterilization record for these device serial numbers have been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event.The devices met material, assembly, and quality control requirements.Cvrx id: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
A barostim system was implanted on (b)(6) 2022.Shortly after implant, the patient sustained a trauma from their dog to the right chest wall overlying the ipg.The patient subsequently developed a subcutaneous hematoma and overlying erythema due to the external trauma.The patient was treated with antibiotics, and there was evidence of wound healing and apposition.On (b)(6) 2022, the patient presented with wound dehiscence and an exposed ipg.A pocket revision, irrigation, and debridement of right chest pocket was performed on (b)(6) 2022.Dissolvable antibiotic beads were also placed in the pocket though there was no evidence of malodor, purulence, or any other sign of pocket infection.It was noted that there had been poor incorporation of the device, and granulation tissue was observed throughout the wound bed.The device was repositioned in the subcutaneous pocket, and the patient was discharged on (b)(6) 2022.During a wound check on (b)(6) 2022, the patient presented with an infection including pain, fever, nausea, and redness at the ipg pocket.A ct showed minimal atelectasis and hypodense fluid surrounding the ipg.The ipg was explanted on (b)(6) 2022, and the csl was capped.Cultures were performed.Although the cultures were negative for infection, the physician stated there was an infection in the chest wall.In the opinion of the surgeon, the infection was related to poor pocket formation and ipg integration.In the opinion of the surgeon, the infection was related to poor pocket formation and ipg integration.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Updated fields: b4, b5, g3, g6, h2, h10 cvrx id# (b)(6).
|
|
Event Description
|
A barostim system was implanted on (b)(6) 2022.Shortly after implant, the patient sustained a trauma from their dog to the right chest wall overlying the ipg.The patient subsequently developed a subcutaneous hematoma and overlying erythema due to the external trauma.The patient was treated with antibiotics, and there was evidence of wound healing and apposition.On (b)(6) 2022, the patient presented with wound dehiscence and an exposed ipg.A pocket revision, irrigation, and debridement of right chest pocket was performed on (b)(6) 2022.Dissolvable antibiotic beads were also placed in the pocket though there was no evidence of malodor, purulence, or any other sign of pocket infection.It was noted that there had been poor incorporation of the device, and granulation tissue was observed throughout the wound bed.The device was repositioned in the subcutaneous pocket, and the patient was discharged on (b)(6) 2022.During a wound check on (b)(6) 2022, the patient presented with an infection including pain, fever, nausea, and redness at the ipg pocket.A ct showed minimal atelectasis and hypodense fluid surrounding the ipg.The ipg was explanted on (b)(6) 2022, and the csl was capped.Cultures were performed.Although the cultures were negative for infection, the physician stated there was an infection in the chest wall.In the opinion of the surgeon, the infection was related to poor pocket formation and ipg integration.As of (b)(6) 2022, the infection had cleared, and the patient was doing well.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|