• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION SUPERION INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, SPINOUS PROCESS SPACER/PLATE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION SUPERION INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, SPINOUS PROCESS SPACER/PLATE Back to Search Results
Model Number 101-9812
Device Problems Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/14/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that during an indirect decompression (id) spacer implant procedure, the physician was having difficulty opening the implant under heavy torque and the implant accidentally detached from the inserter leaving the implant at an angle.When attempting to re-attach and reposition the implant multiple times, and the spindle cap became bent and dislodged from the implant.The patient had a thick spinal process and laminae which caused resistance.The broken spacer was removed and replaced with another spacer of the same size which completed the procedure successfully.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during an indirect decompression (id) spacer implant procedure, the physician was having difficulty opening the implant under heavy torque and the implant accidentally detached from the inserter leaving the implant at an angle.When attempting to re-attach and reposition the implant multiple times, and the spindle cap became bent and dislodged from the implant.The patient had a thick spinal process and laminae which caused resistance.The broken spacer was removed and replaced with another spacer of the same size which completed the procedure successfully.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device analysis performed on the returned indirect decompression spacer revealed that the spindle cap was partially sheared off from the implant body and was deformed.This damage indicates excessive force was likely used during the procedure.Damage to the device prevented functional testing.However, this damage to the spacer indicates the break was due to deployment against resistance, such as bone, and/or manipulation of the position of the device by shifting the inserter.A product labeling review identified that the device was used per the instructions for use (ifu)/product label.Additionally, device breakage can occur when used with forced deployment and is noted within the ifu as a potential complication associated with use of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SUPERION INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, SPINOUS PROCESS SPACER/PLATE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
erik sherburne
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia, CA 91355
7632920920
MDR Report Key15776780
MDR Text Key306891962
Report Number3006630150-2022-06147
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NQO
UDI-Device Identifier00884662000543
UDI-Public00884662000543
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/07/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/10/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number101-9812
Device Catalogue Number101-9812
Device Lot Number29361220
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/24/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/16/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/09/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
Patient RaceWhite
-
-