SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. UNKN SYNERGY HIP STEM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, HEMI-, TRUNNION-BEARING, FEMORAL, METAL/POLYACETAL
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number UNKN01101000 |
Device Problem
Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583)
|
Patient Problem
Joint Dislocation (2374)
|
Event Date 08/31/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that, after a partial hip replacement had been performed 'a long time ago' with tandem bipolar and synergy stem, the patient experienced recurring dislocations.This event was addressed first with closed reductions until it finally led to a converstion to total hip replacement with an r3 system.The stem was also explanted as it was determined to be too short for hip stability.A three sizes bigger stem was selected.Patient was recovering from revision.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Smith & nephew is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 c.F.R.Part 803.This report may be based upon information which smith & nephew has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, smith & nephew, or its employees, that the report constitutes an admission that the device, smith & nephew or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Case-2022-00128304-1.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Section h3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation but the x-rays were reviewed and according to the clinical/medical findings it was revealed that left femoral head prosthesis was completely dislocated from the acetabulum.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, based on the limited information provided, the clinical root cause of the reported ¿recurring dislocations¿, cannot be definitively concluded.However, the report of the stem being ¿determined to be too short for hip stability,¿ cannot be ruled out as contributing factor to the reported clinical events.The patient impact beyond the recurrent dislocation and revision cannot be determined.Per case details, the patient is recovering after the revision.Therefore, no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include traumatic injury, limited range of motion, patient anatomy or abnormal loading of limb.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|