• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAQUET SAS LUCEA 10/40; DEVICE, MEDICAL EXAMINATION, AC POWERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAQUET SAS LUCEA 10/40; DEVICE, MEDICAL EXAMINATION, AC POWERED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ARD568601999
Device Problems Crack (1135); Use of Device Problem (1670); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/09/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information will be provided following the conclusion of the investigation.Device not returned to manufacturer.
 
Event Description
On 9th november 2022, getinge became aware of an issue with one of our examination lights ¿ lucea 40.As it was stated the handle of the lucea 40 ceiling suspension was broken with missing particles and light has fallen during surgery.There was no injury reported, however, we decided to report the issue in abundance of caution as any particles falling off into sterile field or during procedure may cause contamination.
 
Event Description
On 9th november 2022, getinge became aware of an issue with one of our examination lights ¿ lucea 40.As it was initially stated, light has fallen during surgery.After checking the details, it turned out that the light didn't fall down, but the cover at the headlight mounting was broken and the small white particles fell on the patient.The issue was confirmed by photographic evidence.There was no injury reported, however, we decided to report the issue in abundance of caution as any particles falling off during examination procedure may cause infection.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The correction of b5 describe event and problem deems required.This is based on the internal evaluation.Previous b5 describe event and problem: on 9th november 2022, getinge became aware of an issue with one of our examination lights ¿ lucea 40.As it was stated the handle of the lucea 40 ceiling suspension was broken with missing particles and light has fallen during surgery.There was no injury reported, however, we decided to report the issue in abundance of caution as any particles falling off into sterile field or during procedure may cause contamination.Corrected b5 describe event and problem: on 9th november 2022, getinge became aware of an issue with one of our examination lights ¿ lucea 40.As it was initially stated, light has fallen during surgery.After checking the details, it turned out that the light didn't fall down, but the cover at the headlight mounting was broken and the small white particles fell on the patient.The issue was confirmed by photographic evidence.There was no injury reported, however, we decided to report the issue in abundance of caution as any particles falling off during examination procedure may cause infection.Getinge became aware of an issue with one of our examination lights ¿ lucea 40.As it was initially stated, light has fallen during surgery.After checking the details, it turned out that the light didn't fall down, but the cover at the headlight mounting was broken and the small white particles fell on the patient.The issue was confirmed by photographic evidence.There was no injury reported, however, we decided to report the issue in abundance of caution as any particles falling off during examination procedure may cause infection.Based on the information collected, it was established that when the event occurred, the examinational light did not meet its specification, due to headlight cracked with missing particles, which could be considered as technical deficiency, and in this way the device contributed to the event.Based on an information gathered, the device was being used for patient treatment when the event occurrence.When reviewing similar reportable events for the same device type, it was confirmed that in the last 5 years, registered for the issue of headlight cracked with missing particles, there is no event which led to the serious injury.Comparing the number of claimed devices to number of sold devices worldwide, we can assume that the failure ratio for the issue of cracked headlight with missing particles is moderate.As stated by subject matter expert at the manufacturing site, the headlight is cracked due to a violent rotation of the light head.It can be noticed that the housing is split at the stop location.This stop is used to limit the rotation of the light to 290°.The insertion of the stop in the housing (made of abs-pc) is performed by ultrasonic process.It means that it is strain-free after assembly.Then, the only possible root cause to split the housing at this location is a violent shock during rotation.Regarding this stop rotation some tests have been done in 2011 at maquet sas.The test report re11-052 mentions that the light lucea 40 is compliant to the standard ul60601-1.Indeed, tests have been performed on 2 light heads with 50 strong rotations on both direction (clockwise and counterclockwise) and no cracks were found.Getinge shall continue to monitor for any further events of this nature and do not propose any further action at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUCEA 10/40
Type of Device
DEVICE, MEDICAL EXAMINATION, AC POWERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAQUET SAS
parc de limere
avenue de la pomme de pin
ardon
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAQUET SAS
parc de limere
avenue de la pomme de pin
ardon
Manufacturer Contact
pascal jay
parc de limere
avenue de la pomme de pin
ardon 
MDR Report Key15796880
MDR Text Key303736236
Report Number9710055-2022-00471
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KZF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/15/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/15/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberARD568601999
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/15/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured07/22/2010
Is the Device Single Use? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-