WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC EVOLVE STEM 7.5MM +2; PROSTHESIS, ELBOW, HEMI-, RADIAL, POLYMER
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 496S275 |
Device Problem
Inaccurate Information (4051)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/20/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient was undergoing a radial head replacement for a fractured radial head.The physician trialed a 7.5 plus 2 stem and when they opened the actual it was much bigger size than a 7.5.They noticed this when they tried to use the impactor to impact the stem onto the head and the impactor wouldn't fit over the stem.They checked the box, stickers in the box, and the actual part number on the implant to verify it was in fact the 7.5 stem and all of these checked out.Then they laid the radial head stem next to the trial 7.5 stem and the actual implant was noticeably bigger than the trial.To resolve this issue they ended up using a standard 7.5 stem and added 2 to the head.The procedure was completed with an adequate fixation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Once the investigation has been completed any additional information will be reported in a supplemental report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported event could be confirmed, since a review of the dhr did find a deviation indicating a potential mix-up could have occurred during production.It was also determined that two other complaints with a similar allegation was received.Based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to a manufacturing related issue.The failure was caused by an apparent mix-up during quality inspections prior to the laser marking process.A previous non-conformance has been initiated and necessary actions have been addressed in that record.H3 other text : device disposition unknown.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient was undergoing a radial head replacement for a fractured radial head.The physician trialed a 7.5 plus 2 stem and when they opened the actual it was much bigger size than a 7.5.They noticed this when they tried to use the impactor to impact the stem onto the head and the impactor wouldn't fit over the stem.They checked the box, stickers in the box, and the actual part number on the implant to verify it was in fact the 7.5 stem and all of these checked out.Then they laid the radial head stem next to the trial 7.5 stem and the actual implant was noticeably bigger than the trial.To resolve this issue they ended up using a standard 7.5 stem and added 2 to the head.The procedure was completed with an adequate fixation.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|