The reported event could be confirmed since images of ct scans were provided and matches the alleged failure mode.A medical professional reviewed the received information and noted the following: ¿the ct-scan shows status after primary tar and surgical fusion (that is not naturally occurring as was suggested) of the subtalar and calcaneocuboid joints, and a dwyer osteotomy of the calcaneus.Only the hardware from the dwyer osteotomy is in place.The components of the tar (tibial component, pe-liner, and talar component) are intact.There¿s slight subsidence of the talar component.The talar component looks oversized, causing impingement in the medial and lateral gutters.The reason for revision can be confirmed and is a user-related issue.¿ based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to a user related issue.As noted by a medical professional, ¿the talar component looks oversized, causing impingement in the medial and lateral gutters.¿ a review of the device history was not possible because the lot number was not communicated.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Indications of material, manufacturing, or design related problems were unable to be identified as the catalog number and lot number were not communicated.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
|