• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. DENALI JUGULAR SYSTEM; VENA CAVA FILTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. DENALI JUGULAR SYSTEM; VENA CAVA FILTER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number DL950J
Device Problems Failure to Advance (2524); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/27/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that during a filter placement procedure through jugular vein, the filter allegedly failed to advance through the delivery sheath.It was further reported that the filter was removed and replaced with another device.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The catalog number identified in device information has not been cleared in the us, but is similar to the denali filter system products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510k number for the denali filter system products is identified in common device name and pma/510k.Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the device was returned for evaluation.One photo was provided and reviewed.The photo shows the denali filter partially outside the storage tube.One denali jugular delivery system kit was returned for evaluation.During visual evaluation, the filter was noted to be in the storage tube partially exposed.The filter hook was noted to be dislodged from the pusher catheter within the storage tube.The mandrel was used to deploy, however, it was unsuccessful.Functional testing was not performed due to the nature of the complaint.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported failure to advance as the filter was noted to be in the storage tube partially exposed from both the provided photo and visual evaluation of the returned sample.The investigation is also confirmed for the identified device dislodged as the filter hook was noted to be dislodged from the pusher catheter based on visual evaluation of the returned sample.A definitive root cause for the reported failure to advance and identified device dislodged could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.Expiry date: 02/2025.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DENALI JUGULAR SYSTEM
Type of Device
VENA CAVA FILTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury 12804
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key15842636
MDR Text Key307666174
Report Number2020394-2022-00913
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
UDI-Device Identifier00801741040818
UDI-Public(01)00801741040818
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K130366
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/01/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/22/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberDL950J
Device Lot NumberGFGP1050
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/17/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/26/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age65 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-