Attempts to contact the physician for additional information were made; however, no response was received from the physician.No information available regarding the product that was involved.The physician did not provide information for an investigation.Unable to determine if the complaint is about the lap-band or about another band which was available in the us and phased out at the end of 2016.Unable to determine root cause or conduct trending analysis.No new risks identified, the current risk is identified with a low rate of occurrence for the reported complaint categories.No correction or corrective action required.The lot history record for the complaint was not available for review.Unable to determine root cause.The investigation findings do not lead to a clear conclusion about the cause of the reported adverse event.If additional information would be available for investigation in the future, a supplemental report would be made.At this time, the reported issue will be tracked and trended.Section d6a, only year was provided.
|
It was reported by the patient that patient experienced severe reactions to the port.The patient had the gastric band implanted in 2003.3 months after implantation, the patient started getting softball size protrusion over the body area.The patient believed that own body was allergic to the gastric band's components.The patient had 600 cc of fluid drained from the abdomen every month by the doctor.The patient was referred to an allergy specialist, who taped a port on patient's arm for 24 hours in which the patient had rash and blisters everywhere the port touched.After a year of battling excruciating pain, the band was removed.
|