• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ENDOTAK RELIANCE SG; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (NON-CRT)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ENDOTAK RELIANCE SG; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (NON-CRT) Back to Search Results
Model Number 0181
Device Problems High impedance (1291); Pocket Stimulation (1463); Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem (1573)
Patient Problems Cardiac Arrest (1762); Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980)
Event Date 11/08/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient had a bike test done where a magnet was applied to the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd).The following day a stress test was performed and the patient went into a spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (vt) where the icd appropriately detected and delivered a shock.However the shock was ineffective, and no further therapy was delivered to the patient.The patient was rescued by the clinician by resuscitation maneuvers.The patient recovered and was hospitalized.The same day several attempts to interrogate the icd were unsuccessful despite the use of four different programmers.It was further noted that the icd would not emit beeping tones upon magnet application.Review of the data stored in the device, found it had been working appropriately prior to the stress test.There were no notable faults stored in the device's memory.Ts discussed that the icd and right ventricular (rv) lead should be explanted as there could be a possibility the device shocked into a shorted condition.The patient would be considered unprotected until explant.A few days later a revision procedure was performed.An x-ray was taken just before starting the procedure and did not show any abnormalities of the device or lead.During the procedure pacing with 5 volts using the chronic rv lead issued pocket stimulation.Pin connectors of the lead were visually fine.The yoke of the lead was completed surrounded with pocket tissue, making it impossible to observe the full lead.The rv lead pacing impedance was at 380 ohms and the shock impedance in unipolar was high at 135 ohms.The icd was able to be explanted, however the rv lead remains implanted and surgically abandoned.A new icd and rv lead were successfully implanted, and no additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
No additional information is available.If additional information becomes available the report will be updated at that time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
No additional information is available.If additional information becomes available the report will be updated at that time.This report is being filed to update the patient code to a more appropriate code than initially reported.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient had a bike test done where a magnet was applied to the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd).The following day a stress test was performed and the patient went into a spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (vt) where the icd appropriately detected and delivered a shock.However the shock was ineffective, and no further therapy was delivered to the patient.The patient was rescued by the clinician by resuscitation maneuvers.The patient recovered and was hospitalized.The same day several attempts to interrogate the icd were unsuccessful despite the use of four different programmers.It was further noted that the icd would not emit beeping tones upon magnet application.Review of the data stored in the device, found it had been working appropriately prior to the stress test.There were no notable faults stored in the device's memory.Ts discussed that the icd and right ventricular (rv) lead should be explanted as there could be a possibility the device shocked into a shorted condition.The patient would be considered unprotected until explant.A few days later a revision procedure was performed.An x-ray was taken just before starting the procedure and did not show any abnormalities of the device or lead.During the procedure pacing with 5 volts using the chronic rv lead issued pocket stimulation.Pin connectors of the lead were visually fine.The yoke of the lead was completed surrounded with pocket tissue, making it impossible to observe the full lead.The rv lead pacing impedance was at 380 ohms and the shock impedance in unipolar was high at 135 ohms.The icd was able to be explanted, however the rv lead remains implanted and surgically abandoned.A new icd and rv lead were successfully implanted, and no additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDOTAK RELIANCE SG
Type of Device
IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (NON-CRT)
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key15867329
MDR Text Key304327949
Report Number2124215-2022-49228
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWS
UDI-Device Identifier00802526531156
UDI-Public00802526531156
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeBE
PMA/PMN Number
P910073/S043
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician Assistant
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/27/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date06/04/2015
Device Model Number0181
Device Catalogue Number0181
Device Lot Number322465
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/04/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
-
-