It was reported that a patient was treated for an acute basilar tip aneurysm with a web device.The surgeon determined that the first web device chosen was too large, so it was removed and replaced with a smaller web device.Initially, the surgeon had difficulty detaching the device, but was ultimately successful and was happy with the web placement.It was reported that the patient later passed from a re-bleed on an unknown date.There is no indication of product issues or connection to the patient post-procedure death.
|
Following 11/3/22 initial submission, the company reviewed images provided by the customer: image 1: poor quality 3d ct angio of the distal basilar artery, ap projection, showing a medium-sized, wide neck basilar tip aneurysm, with a murphy's tit at its apex.No measurements are on the image.P22-5237 image 2: coronal cta shows the same aneurysm.Height: 9.1 mm, width: 7.6 mm.P22-5237 image 3: axial cta shows the same aneurysm.Two width measurements are shown, each 8.1 mm.P22-5237 image 4: sagittal cta shows the same aneurysm.Height: 8.2 mm.P22-5237 image 5: ap sim & cure image.No measurements of suggested device.These images do not explain or demonstrate the reported sizing or detachment challenges or the reasons for the fatal rebleed.Without the return and physical evaluation of the device, the investigation cannot definitively determine if a product-related condition existed that would have caused or contributed to the reported event.However, the device's risk documentation does not suggest any potential or new manufacturing, design, quality, or other systemic issues, or non-conformances.Moreover, a search for non-conformances associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the reported event.The company notes that all reported issues that occurred are well-recognized potential complications that are addressed in the product's instructions for use.
|