• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. REF XLPE 32 20 DEG 50-52 E; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. REF XLPE 32 20 DEG 50-52 E; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED Back to Search Results
Model Number 71333334
Device Problems Crack (1135); Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 11/08/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that, after a thr performed on (b)(6) 2009, a revision surgery was required on (b)(6) 2021 to replace an old reflection liner (ref required 32 20 deg 50 52 e) that was cracked.The current health status of patient is unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported that, after a thr performed on (b)(6) 2009, a revision surgery was requiered on (b)(6) 2021 to replace an old reflection liner (ref xlpe 32 20 deg 50 52 e) that was cracked.The current health status of patient is unknown.Visual inspection of the returned device revealed a fractured insert.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
B5: describe event or problem.Section h3, h6: the associated device was returned and evaluated.The visual inspection revealed a fractured insert.A lab analysis performed on the device revealed that no material or manufacturing deviations were observed in the liner.The liner shows significant deformation from wear.Yellowish discoloration of the polyethylene of implants can occur when exposed to fluids in or around a joint.Black coloration is observed on an edge that could possibly be caused by wear debris from the femoral head contacting the metal shell over time.There is gouging and scratches along the top of the liner that could have possibly been caused by extraction.It is not possible to determine the cause of the wear in the liner nor the cause of the fragment breaking away from the liner from this investigation.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, as of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided; therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the reported event.The patient impact beyond the reported event cannot be determined.No further clinical assessment is warranted at this time.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for total hip systems revealed that the implant can break or become damaged as a result of strenuous activity or trauma.The patient should be warned that the device does not replace normal healthy bone, this has been identified as warnings and precautions.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.The quality and manufacture of polyethylene shall be controlled according with the material specification.A review made by the quality engineering team revealed that this complaint is not able to have dimensional evaluation performed due to the damage incurred on the part based on photo provided.The failure mode shown in the photos does not raise concerns, as the polyethylene implant is expected to weaken over time, based on feedback from hip product development and research and development groups.This deterioration is influenced by multiple factors (including patient factors, environmental factors, surgical factors, mating surface factors, etc.) and can manifest in different ways.There is no reason to imply dimensional or functional defect(s) at this time considering product use-life was 11+ years.Additionally, this is the only complaint for the indicated batch.For the reasons stated above, no further escalation or actions will be pursued.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include abnormal loading of limb, excessive forces and/or traumatic injury.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.H6: medical device problem code.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
REF XLPE 32 20 DEG 50-52 E
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key15901325
MDR Text Key304681632
Report Number1020279-2022-04875
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDI
UDI-Device Identifier03596010455673
UDI-Public03596010455673
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K002747
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/02/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/12/2015
Device Model Number71333334
Device Catalogue Number71333334
Device Lot Number05JM08153
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/31/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
OXINIUM FEM HD 12/14 32MM +8, LOT#:05KM05527; REF LNR 32X 50-52 20DG SZ E, LOT#:05KM05527
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-