Additional information provided in d.9., h.3., h.6., and h.10.A review of the device history record traceable to the reported serial number indicates that the product was processed and released according to the product¿s acceptance criteria.During onsite visit, fse (field service engineer) replaced puf pcb board and performed system verification.System meets specifications as per sir (service installation record).The review of logfile for the day of treatment shows all laser system functions were within specifications.The vacuum check, the energy check and the ablation check were performed successfully without issue.The energy was stabile during the whole day.The logfile shows zero successfully performed treatments.The reported treatment could be identified in the logfile.The treatment of the patient´s right eye was aborted by device after bed cut.Treatment was only ninety two percent complete.The laser showed the info message: warning info=vacuum exceeds limits - treatment is aborted.Repeat vacuum check buttons=.No relevant deviation between planed and performed energy is detectable for the reported treatment.The user operated surgery within the recommended energy settings.The thickness of the flap was thinner than the recommended flap thickness.Review of the log files for the treatment day does not show any other relevant warning or error messages.Without sample root cause could not be determined conclusively.Most probable root cause is a faulty puf pcb board.The manufacturer internal reference number is:(b)(4).
|