The reason for this instrument failure was reported as broken tap.The healthcare professional indicated this event occurred during surgery, near the patient.No response received by the surgeon.The surgery was completed as intended, with a twenty-minute delay.The instrument was inspected prior to use and was deemed acceptable for use based on its appearance.The agent was present during surgery and was able to source a suitable replacement device.The devices were returned to the manufacturer and made available at djo surgical for evaluation.The revision level or lot number were not reported; therefore, this instrument could not be linked to a specific device history record (dhr) or the actual date of manufacture could not be determined with confidence.Complaint database review showed 31 previous complaints but there were no indications that this instrument has a design or material deficiency.Those are 29 - broke/cracked/damaged, 1 - device cracked/ broke and 1 - threads damaged/galled.The root cause of this complaint is likely attributable to damage incurred from prolonged use and through misuse or rough handling which surgical instruments are subjected to.This is not an event associated with a product failure, malfunction, or issue.There are no indications that this instrument has a systemic design or material deficiency.Therefore, no containment of inventory is required.Event is associated with instrument usage, not a design or manufacturing issue.Rma examination: the instrument was returned to djo and after further examination, tap broke in half.
|