Model Number CDS0706-NTW |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528); Difficult to Open or Close (2921)
|
Patient Problem
Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
|
Event Date 12/02/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
This is filed to report the leaflet stuck on the gripper, causing a gripper actuation issue and tissue injury.It was reported that a mitraclip procedure was performed to treat functional mitral regurgitation (mr) with grade of 4+.The clip was advanced to the mitral valve.The anterior leaflet at some point became stuck on the anterior gripper when attempting to grasp the leaflets.Troubleshooting was performed, however, it was not possible to see the grippers raising and lowering like normal on echocardiogram.The fluoroscopy was pulled up, the clip was inverted and the gripper element could be seen on the anterior side to not be raising and lowering like it should.More maneuvering was performed to attempt to get off the anterior leaflet.The physician pulled the clip delivery system (cds) into the atrium and the gripper element finally released from the leaflet, however, the leaflet was damaged during that process.After removal from the patient, the gripper line on that gripper was completely missing.The grippers had worked fine during preparation.The procedure was aborted with mr remaining at grade 4.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents reported from this lot.Based on available information and without the device to analyze, the reported image resolution poor was associated with imaging difficulty.The cause of the reported difficult to open or close (gripper actuation ¿ single) associated with the gripper actuation issue was due to the gripper line breaking.The cause of the reported break (cable break) associated with the gripper line break, and the reported unspecified tissue injury (no treatment) associated with the supposed leaflet injury, appear to be due to the difficulty in removing the gripper from anatomy.The cause of the reported difficult to remove (anatomy) associated with the gripper becoming stuck on the leaflet was due to procedural circumstances during positioning (low tsp, poor visualization) in conjunction with challenging patient anatomy (restricted leaflets).The reported patient effect of tissue injury, as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use, is a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.The reported serious injury/ illness/ impairment was a result of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|
|
Event Description
|
This is filed to report the leaflet stuck on the gripper, causing a gripper actuation issue and tissue injury.It was reported that a mitraclip procedure was performed to treat functional mitral regurgitation (mr) with grade of 4+.The clip was advanced to the mitral valve.The anterior leaflet at some point became stuck on the anterior gripper when attempting to grasp the leaflets.Troubleshooting was performed, however, it was not possible to see the grippers raising and lowering like normal on echocardiogram.The fluoroscopy was pulled up, the clip was inverted and the gripper element could be seen on the anterior side to not be raising and lowering like it should.More maneuvering was performed to attempt to get off the anterior leaflet.The physician pulled the clip delivery system (cds) into the atrium and the gripper element finally released from the leaflet, however, the leaflet was damaged during that process.After removal from the patient, the gripper line on that gripper was completely missing.The grippers had worked fine during preparation.The procedure was aborted with mr remaining at grade 4.Subsequent to the initial report, it was noted that there had been difficulties seeing the anterior clip arm due to shaft positioning and shadowing.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|