• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number G49950
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/01/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
As reported, before an ureterorenoscopy procedure, an universa soft ureteral stent set was opened and the user found the front end of the stent was broken.Another device of the same type was used to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional interventions and did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Summary of event: as reported, before an ureterorenoscopy procedure, an universa soft ureteral stent set was opened, and the user found the front end of the stent was broken.Another device of the same type was used to complete the procedure.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), specification, and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection was conducted also.A universa soft ureteral stent was returned to cook for investigation.It was noted that the stent was returned in two pieces with one of the pieces being an entire pigtail.It is not known whether the separated pigtail is the pigtail where the stent tether is located as both ends of this type of stent are tapered.The tether was not returned.One of the side ports on the separated pigtail had a tear originating from it; however, this side port wouldn¿t be associated with the tether even if the separated pigtail was from the tethered end.The torn side port is closer to the body portion of the stent than the taper, where the tethered side port is located.A review of complaint history records shows no other related complaints associated with the complaint device lot.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.The product ifu provides the following information: ¿precautions: the tether should be removed if the stent is to remain indwelling longer than 14 days.¿ ¿how supplied: upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ because there were no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities had been established, there was objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other known lot related complaints had been received from the field, it is concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing and quality control documents were conducted.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation is required.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.The complaint reported by the customer of the stent being broke was confirmed due to customer testimony and inspection.Despite receiving the device and performing an inspection, the cause of the break was not able to be determined.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET
Type of Device
FAD STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key15997426
MDR Text Key308454592
Report Number1820334-2022-01852
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
UDI-Device Identifier00827002499508
UDI-Public(01)00827002499508(17)251014(10)NS15020526
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K151051
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/16/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberG49950
Device Catalogue NumberUSH-726
Device Lot NumberNS15020526
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/23/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/14/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-