• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX 35 DRUG-ELUTING STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX 35 DRUG-ELUTING STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problems Off-Label Use (1494); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 05/07/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Bohme et al 2021 - evaluation of stent angioplasty in the treatment of arteriosclerotic lesions of the common femoral artery.Patients treated with atherosclerotic lesions of the cfa between january 2008 and december 2018 were retrospectively selected from a prospective maintained database.Medical records, angiographies and endovascular procedures as well as duplex ultrasound examinations and ankle¿brachial index (abi) measurements were analyzed.Two-year target lesion revascularization (tlr) rate was the primary end point.Secondary end points were primary patency (restenosis was defined as stenosis with a peak systolic velocity ratio > 2.5 on color-flow duplex ultrasound measuring), overall procedural complication rate, the rate of ipsilateral cfa punctures during follow up, changes in rbc and ankle¿brachial index (abi), amputation rate and predictors on the reintervention rates.The procedural complication rate includes access site complications, target vessel perforation, outflow embolization and compartment syndrome.The time to tlr and the type of tlr (surgery or endovascular procedure) were documented.Zilver ptx stent used off label for evaluation of stent angioplasty in the treatment of arteriosclerotic lesions of the common femoral artery.This complaint was opened to capture one technical complication.Details of complications not provided in the literature paper and no adverse effects reported as a result of the technical failure.No adverse effects to the patient reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k) # p100022/s014.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
 
Event Description
Supplement cancellation report being submitted due to receipt of clinical input on 08-feb-2023 confirming that the off-label use of zilver ptx device described in this literature paper were not attributed to the adverse events reported.Incident does not meet the criteria an fda ¿serious injury¿ report or ¿malfunction¿ report as per fda guidelines ¿medical device reporting for manufacturers (2016)¿.This complaint was opened to capture one technical complication.Details of complications not provided in the literature paper and no adverse effects reported as a result of the technical failure.Updated description of event: bohme et al 2021 - evaluation of stent angioplasty in the treatment of arteriosclerotic lesions of the common femoral artery.Patients treated with atherosclerotic lesions of the cfa between january 2008 and december 2018 were retrospectively selected from a prospective maintained database.Medical records, angiographies and endovascular procedures as well as duplex ultrasound examinations and ankle¿brachial index (abi) measurements were analyzed.Two-year target lesion revascularization (tlr) rate was the primary end point.Secondary end points were primary patency (restenosis was defined as stenosis with a peak systolic velocity ratio > 2.5 on color-flow duplex ultrasound measuring), overall procedural complication rate, the rate of ipsilateral cfa punctures during follow up, changes in rbc and ankle¿brachial index (abi), amputation rate and predictors on the reintervention rates.The procedural complication rate includes access site complications, target vessel perforation, outflow embolization and compartment syndrome.The time to tlr and the type of tlr (surgery or endovascular procedure) were documented.This complaint was opened to capture one technical complication.Details of complications not provided in the literature paper and no adverse effects reported as a result of the technical failure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k) # p100022/s014.Incident does not meet the criteria an fda ¿serious injury¿ report or ¿malfunction¿ report as per fda guidelines ¿medical device reporting for manufacturers (2016)¿.This complaint was opened to capture one technical complication.Details of complications not provided in the literature paper and no adverse effects reported as a result of the technical failure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ZILVER PTX 35 DRUG-ELUTING STENT
Type of Device
NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick
Manufacturer Contact
sinead o'leary
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick 
MDR Report Key16003863
MDR Text Key308554675
Report Number3001845648-2022-00897
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIU
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeGM
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/08/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/19/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date05/07/2022
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received11/21/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-