Nurse states patient experiencing postpartum bleeding and has jada in place and the suction is set to 90 mmhg and the patient is still bleeding [device ineffective].Case narrative: this initial spontaneous report originating from the united states, was received from a nurse, referring to a non-pregnant female patient of unknown age.The patient's concurrent conditions included large uterine fibroid and hospitalization.Patient's historical conditions included pregnancy and delivery.It was reported that the patient had one term pregnancy and post-partum hemorrhage with that birth.Patient received an oxytocin (pitocin) bolus after delivery.Her concomitant medications, and drug reactions/allergies were not reported.This report concerns 1 patient and 1 device.On (b)(6) 2022, the patient was started on vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) (lot# and expiry date were not reported) via vaginal route for postpartum haemorrhage.The nurse who was taking care of the patient stated that, the patient was experiencing postpartum bleeding and had vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) in place and the suction was set to 90 millimeters of mercury (mmhg) and the patient was still bleeding at the time of the initial report (device ineffective, onset date: (b)(6) 2022).She urgently wanted to speak to the medical liaison for vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system).It was also reported that patient had sought medical attention.The nurse also stated that the physician was operating the device however it was her and other nurses who were offering instructions utilizing their "badge buddy" they received from a recent training, and it went very well.The patient had lost 120 milliliter (ml) of blood and the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was discontinued after 3 hours after controlling the bleeding well (conflicting information).The device was not removed and reinserted.No other adverse event (ae) and product quality complaint (pqc) were reported.No additional patient or device information was provided by the nurse.The availability of vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was unknown.Upon internal review, the event of device ineffective was determined to be medically significant.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.Fda code: (health effects - health impact per annex f): unexpected medical intervention (b)(4) patient required an unforeseen medical intervention, excluding surgery, which was not on the original treatment plan.
|