• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ORGANON & CO. JADA SYSTEM; INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ORGANON & CO. JADA SYSTEM; INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information we have received, there is no indication that the device malfunctioned.The device is assembled according to specifications.In process and finished product testing are performed and approved prior to release.
 
Event Description
Staff could never achieve adequate suction and the jada was removed.Patient ended up getting a hysterectomy for continued bleeding [device issue] reporter states they initially put air in the cervical seal and then removed it and put a sterile fluid [wrong technique in device usage process] case narrative: this initial spontaneous report originating from the united states, was received from a physician via company representative, referring to a non-pregnant female patient of an unknown age.The patient's medical history included pregnancy and delivery, and her concurrent conditions included hospitalization.Her past drugs, allergies and concomitant medications were not reported.This report concerns 1 patient and 1 device.On an unknown date, the patient had vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) inserted (lot#, serial # and expiration date were not reported) via vaginal route for postpartum hemorrhage by the physician.The reporter stated that there was some trouble achieving suction, because the wall suction nearest the patient was not functional and they had to add 6 feet (ft) additional suction tubing to what was provided with the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system).Reporter stated that they initially put air in the cervical seal and then removed it and put a sterile fluid (wrong technique in device usage process).Reporter also stated that they were concerned that possibly the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was not placed correctly but was on top of the cervix and that was affecting its functioning.Staff could never achieve adequate suction and the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was removed.Patient ended up getting a hysterectomy for continued bleeding (device issue).Staff reported that while the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was inserted the uterus was toned, once it was removed it was boggy again.The patient sought medical attention, and the reporter also stated that they believed the lack of suction nearest the patient might have been a factor.No further information was known at the time of reporting.The availability of vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was unknown.Upon internal review, the event of device issue was determined to be serious as it required intervention.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
JADA SYSTEM
Type of Device
INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ORGANON & CO.
30 hudson street
jersey city NJ 07302
Manufacturer (Section G)
ORGANON & CO.
30 hudson street
jersey city NJ 07302
Manufacturer Contact
30 hudson street
jersey city, NJ 07302
MDR Report Key16005568
MDR Text Key305718920
Report Number3002806821-2022-00024
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OQY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
510K K201199
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/19/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/19/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-