• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS LUCERA GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS LUCERA GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number GIF-Q260J
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Perforation (2001)
Event Date 03/07/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It is reported in the literature titled ¿carbazochrome sodium sulfonate is not effective for prevention of post gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding: a retrospective study,¿ patients experienced adverse events post-procedure(s).Background: carbazochrome sodium sulfonate (css) is conventionally administered to prevent post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (esd) bleeding in many institutions, but research on its preventive efficacy is lacking.Therefore, we investigated the risk of post-esd bleeding and the preventive efficacy of css administration.Methods: we retrospectively reviewed 304 lesions in 259 patients with gastric neoplasms who underwent esd at asahikawa medical university hospital from 2014 to 2021.In the css group, css 100 mg/day was intravenously infused with maintenance fluid replacement on postoperative days 0¿2.The risk factors of post-esd bleeding, including css administration, were investigated.Results: the overall rate of post-esd bleeding was 4.6% (14/304).The univariate analysis showed that atrial fibrillation (af), warfarin intake, heparin replacement, and tumor location in the lower third were significant risk factors for increasing the likelihood of postoperative bleeding.In the multivariate analysis, af (odds ratio [or] 3.83, 95% ci 1.02¿14.30; p¿<¿0.05), heparin replacement (or 4.60, 95% ci 1.02¿20.70; p¿<¿0.05), and tumor location in the lower third of the stomach (or 6.67, 95% ci 1.43¿31.00; p¿<¿0.05) were independent factors for post-esd bleeding.Post-esd bleeding was observed in 5.2% (9/174) of the css group and 3.8% (5/130) of the non-css group, with no significant difference between the two groups (p¿=¿0.783).Additionally, css was not shown to have preventive effects in groups with higher-risk factors, such as af diagnosis, warfarin use, heparin replacement, and tumor location in the lower third of the stomach.Conclusion: css administration was not effective for the prevention of the post-esd bleeding in the overall patient population as well as in higher-risk patients.This suggests that the administration of css for post-esd bleeding prevention may need to be reconsidered.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports gif-q260j.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports kd-655l.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports kd-610l.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports fd-412lr.There is no report of olympus device malfunction during any procedure described in this literature.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device referenced in this report was not returned to olympus for evaluation.The definitive cause of the user's experience cannot be determined at this time.The investigation is ongoing.This report will be updated upon completion of the investigation or upon receipt of additional relevant information.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial and/or lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse event cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Therefore, the root cause cannot be determined.This supplemental report includes a correction to b3 and g2.Information added to these fields that was inadvertently not included on the initial medwatch.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVIS LUCERA GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA  965-8520
Manufacturer (Section G)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key16013980
MDR Text Key305797406
Report Number9610595-2022-05740
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K954451
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Study,Literature,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberGIF-Q260J
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/20/2022
Initial Date FDA Received12/20/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/27/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/06/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Other;
-
-