It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a rotatable small oval med stiff snare was used during a cold polypectomy procedure performed on an unknown date.During the procedure and inside the patient, the snare grasped the polyp, but could not resect the polyp.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a rotatable small oval med stiff snare was used during a cold polypectomy procedure performed on an unknown date.During the procedure and inside the patient, the snare grasped the polyp, but could not resect the polyp.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
Block b3: approximated based on the date the manufacturer became aware of the event.Block h6: medical device problem code a050702 captures the reportable event of snare loop cutting problems.Block h10: investigation results- a rotatable small oval med stiff snare was received for analysis.Visual inspection of the returned device revealed no damages were found.Functional testing was performed, and the loop could extend and retract well.The 2-in-1 connector passed dimensional testing.Electrical testing was performed, and the device failed the test since the 2 in 1 connector was provoking the connection.Per the destructive test, the active cord was in good condition; cannulas in the proximal section and 3 rot wires were in good condition.No other problems were noted.The reported complaint of loop failure to cut was not confirmed since the device cannot be functionally evaluated concerning anatomical/procedural factors encountered during the procedure.During the product analysis, it was found that the device failed the electrical test and this problem was related to a component manufactured by an external supplier.This problem was likely due to the manufacturing process.Based on the information available and the returned device analysis, the most probable root cause for the reported complaint is manufacturing deficiency since the problem is traced to the manufacturing process a labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the instructions for use (ifu) / product label.
|