It was reported that during preparation of a dragonfly catheter, it was being purged with contrast; however, instead of finding resistance it was abnormally easy and flow of contrast was high.When purging the channel air was noted; therefore, the device was not used to avoid injecting air to patient's coronary arteries.The procedure was successfully completed with another unspecified catheter.There was no patient involvement.No additional information was provided.
|
Visual and functional analysis was performed on the returned device.The reported air leak was unable to be confirmed as the device was purged normally without any anomalies.During visual analysis, there were no damages noted to the device.The cap and the syringe were not returned.During the functional analysis, the device was able to be purged normally and no leaks were noted.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar complaints reported from this lot.Based on the information received and analysis of the returned device, the investigation was not able to determine a definitive cause for the reported leak.The catheter was able to be purged and water exited the catheter at the purge hole, no liquid leaked or exited out of any other catheter location during testing.It may be possible that, during device preparation, the syringe was not mated correctly to the purge port.However, this could not be confirmed.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.D4:.
|