Product analysis #(b)(4): the customer returned one image.Image 1: the image depicts what appears to be the patients vasculature system with what appears to be a deformed stent deployed, with a guidewire running through the stent.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
Hold 1.31 it
a protege rx was implanted for the treatment of a 25mm calcified plaque lesion with chronic total occlusion in the proximal region of the left subclavian artery.The artery diameter was 9.5 proximal; 7mm - distal.There was severe tortuosity and calcification.It was reported the stent deployed normally, no resistance encountered and the device did no pass through a previously deployed stent.After the procedure, the image in dsa showed the proximal end of the stent diameter was only 6mm (while the expected diameter is 10mm) and at the distal, the diameter of the stent is 8.16mm (while the expected diameter is 7mm).No patient injury reported.
|