Due to the automated manufacturing execution system (mes), there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.During visual/microscopic inspection, the device was returned inserted in a microcatheter.No anomalies were noted with the microcatheter.The stent was seen to be partially deployed.The sdw was seen to be intact.Copious amount of dried procedural fluids was noticed on the device.The stent was deployed seen to be intact.The introducer sheath was not returned.During functional inspection, the stent was partially deployed, so full deployment was carried out.Copious amount of dried procedural fluids was noticed on the device.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The reported ¿stent difficult/unable to advance or pullback through catheter¿ could not be confirmed; however, the analysis results are consistent with the reported event.The device failed to meet specifications when received for complaint investigation based on the analyzed anomalies noted to the device.Addition information received was the device was prepared as per the directions for use, there was no damage noted to the packaging prior to opening the packaging, the device was confirmed to be in good condition prior to use on the patient and continuous flush was set up and maintained throughout the clinical procedure.The device was returned for analysis with a microcatheter.The catheter was confirmed to be intact.The stent was returned partially deployed from the distal tip of the catheter, it was fully deployed during device analysis and found to be intact.The sdw was returned and found to be intact, and the introducer sheath was not returned for device analysis.It¿s likely when the reported resistance was felt during the procedure manipulation of the device would have caused the stent partial deployment.The as analyzed (aa) ¿stent partial deployment¿ as well as the as reported (ar) ¿stent difficult/unable to advance or pullback through catheter¿ will be assigned procedural factors as this complaint appears to be associated with a product that met stryker design and manufacturing specifications and was used in accordance with the dfu, but performance was limited due to procedural and/or anatomical factors during use.
|